Do you think LB should have interchangeable championship belts?

These will be championship belts that will be interchanged amongst members to replace some of the user titles. They will be kept in your signature as opposed to under your name. And will be in three tiers. Lightweight, middleweight, and heavyweight. If it works out well, it can also be extended to the secondary titles(orange usertitles) And be defended both in the tournament, and between tournaments within the basic arena as well.

---------- Post added at 02:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:51 PM ----------

@iCaL @ILLoKWENT @Row @RULE @Dirty Work @Esso @Indica @Manhattan @Babylon

I think we had talked about this a long time ago.

Would like to see what the people say

[Xercius]

That is a pretty cool idea...It has a wrestlin feel to it..

There's not enough activity. The official tourneys that get you a perma title have a hard enough time filling up & getting people to show

The forum should have that Wrestling feel to it

Heels
Faces
Titles

Etc.

[Esso]

Theres no actual 'weight advantage' in text battling tho. Work from the bottom, if youre good enough to win, you win. No rewards for being 'best of the weaksauce'. TBH, Itd be great to have the orange titles (tag, scheme, concept, topical) up for grabs at a 'ppv' 'every month along with the LBT along with an undercard of people working their way up.

****agreed with Esso

[Malishus]

tis would be dope.for each title ,the entire card will be based off of the title..ex.. everyth8ng scheme, topical, one bar..etc

Originally Posted by Malishus

tis would be dope.for each title ,the entire card will be based off of the title..ex.. everyth8ng scheme, one bar..etc

yea, but activity is way too low for this.

Originally Posted by Row

yea, but activity is way too low for this.

No one's saying that it has to be implemented RIGHT THIS SECOND, though. The titles can be vacant until there's enough activity.

And to @Esso's point, and @Malishus', I'd like for it to be a case where it doesn't necessarily have to be at a PPV, either. But, rather, can be defended on a weekly, daily, or whenever basis. Of course, I'd like to include battles for these titles in both PPVs, AND have them defended in their actual annual tournaments, as well. So, overall, while it will still be up for grabs both in its respective bracketed tournaments, and on a monthly basis in the LBT threads, it can also change hands between both of these taking place. Which shakes the battles up a bit overall. Of, course, it will only be MANDATORY to defend it once a month, it CAN BE defended at any time, if someone calls the champ out for it(which they'll have the right to decline, albeit being labeled as a duck in the process, probably.)

Edit: Also, why couldn't this have the capacity to generate activity? I think it's important to have activities which they can participate in for new members. Sure, they don't always check the forums, but, collectively, why don't we ADVERTISE IT TO THEM!? Send out PM's with links to the threads(not just to who you think is dope, but to EVERYBODY.) Post it on their profile pages, link it in the battles that are taking place with members who don't often check the forums. There's ways to generate activity amongst the site, people just have to fucking do it. @Row you included.