|
01-05-2015, 06:23 PM
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,932
Mentioned: 1080 Post(s)
Tagged: 35 Thread(s)
|
Set-up Battling
There's been a lot of controversy I'm noticing about this site. ''Who's sending'' seems to be one of the biggest ones around. Why not implement a way to battle regularly in a tournament format? Basically, both post and whatever the date's set-for the battle's revealed. And if one fails to meet the deadline, the other receives a W or.. the other receives points or infractions, if they build-up to a certain point they are punished. Idk, I just feel this would solve a lot of BS.
|
01-05-2015, 06:31 PM
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,783
Mentioned: 1223 Post(s)
Tagged: 57 Thread(s)
|
theres lots of good ideas .. the problem is these ideas need to be put into code and i dont think there are the resources to do it
|
01-05-2015, 06:34 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
The whole who sending first thing is just an excuse for them not really wanting to battle but just talk smack infront of everyone they can do blind drops on the spot... simple
|
01-05-2015, 06:34 PM
|
#3
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
The whole who sending first thing is just an excuse for them not really wanting to battle but just talk smack infront of everyone they can do blind drops on the spot... simple
|
|
|
01-05-2015, 06:36 PM
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,560
Mentioned: 1026 Post(s)
Tagged: 38 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperGuy
The whole who sending first thing is just an excuse for them not really wanting to battle but just talk smack infront of everyone they can do blind drops on the spot... simple
|
Except me. I responded to Bnas within 24 hrs. But ya this is only an issue with oldheads and goats really, like @ Jason , i'm past that now so no offence lol. This doesn't have enough demand to really need to be coded.
|
01-05-2015, 06:41 PM
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I also had an idea relating to this somewhat, maybe it would work out better if a person can only send a battle to the other if the other is online at the same time. The only thing is, though, if the person still doesn't respond, the battle still sits (so they won't have to worry about their bars gettin took) they just can't respond to it after it has reached a certain deadline. Yeah, they should have deadline periods. I have no idea if that's a possible thing to do, but this would keep battles from not getting slept on.
|
01-05-2015, 06:41 PM
|
#5
|
Basic Text Record 204 Points / 22 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 0 Points / Won / Lost
Join Date: Feb 2013
Voted:
19
audio / 60
text
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I also had an idea relating to this somewhat, maybe it would work out better if a person can only send a battle to the other if the other is online at the same time. The only thing is, though, if the person still doesn't respond, the battle still sits (so they won't have to worry about their bars gettin took) they just can't respond to it after it has reached a certain deadline. Yeah, they should have deadline periods. I have no idea if that's a possible thing to do, but this would keep battles from not getting slept on.
|
Offline
|
|
01-05-2015, 06:42 PM
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,932
Mentioned: 1080 Post(s)
Tagged: 35 Thread(s)
|
Sending/receiving is just stupid to begin with. Why wouldn't every battle just be a blind? The receiver gets 3 days to study the other's bar and top them lol. To me, that seems unfair anyway you put it.
|
01-05-2015, 06:43 PM
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
True.
|
01-05-2015, 06:43 PM
|
#7
|
Basic Text Record 204 Points / 22 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 0 Points / Won / Lost
Join Date: Feb 2013
Voted:
19
audio / 60
text
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
True.
|
Offline
|
|
01-05-2015, 06:43 PM
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,560
Mentioned: 1026 Post(s)
Tagged: 38 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obey
Sending/receiving is just stupid to begin with. Why wouldn't every battle just be a blind? The receiver gets 3 days to study the other's bar and top them lol. To me, that seems unfair anyway you put it.
|
Because flipping is so frowned upon now that it has been disallowed in every organized tournament, as a result, people as a habit usually do not flip it is obsolete.
|
01-05-2015, 06:45 PM
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,932
Mentioned: 1080 Post(s)
Tagged: 35 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subreal
Because flipping is so frowned upon now that it has been disallowed in every organized tournament, as a result, people as a habit usually do not flip it is obsolete.
|
But still, you get 3 days to look at someone's bar and try to make more polished and more complex lines lol. No battle is like that in real life, imagine if a live battle got someone's bars 3 days ahead. He'd wreck them.
|
01-05-2015, 06:47 PM
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
That's what I'm saying, they should have deadlines, and in order for a person to send to the other, the other has to be online at the same time.
|
01-05-2015, 06:47 PM
|
#10
|
Basic Text Record 204 Points / 22 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 0 Points / Won / Lost
Join Date: Feb 2013
Voted:
19
audio / 60
text
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
That's what I'm saying, they should have deadlines, and in order for a person to send to the other, the other has to be online at the same time.
|
Offline
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
,
|
|
|
,
|
|
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 AM.
|
|
|