The Holocaust did happen you racist fuck.

[Execute]

Well, your denial for claiming the 'holocaust never happened' bullshit is well understood now.

[Godbody]

Originally Posted by Chopsteady

It doesn't surprise me to see that your lack of knowledge of the word's definition has left you ill-equipped to properly use it in a sentence. The word "therefore" is definitely not defined by the phrase "as a result of." It is in fact an adverb, so a better definition would be, "for that/this reason," but I doubt you see the difference in those phrases. Try a synonym for "therefore" such as "consequently" in your sentence. You're essentially saying that the reason winners write history to their liking is that they write history. LMAOOOO Do you not see the problem? No, I guess you don't, but hey, you still know a lot of cool terms like truth tables that you can throw around and impress fellow idiots. By the way, money made and bitches fucked are not measurements of intelligence nor sanity.

Oh, and while I'm at it, why don't I nitpick your use of the phrase "degrees and PhD's?" Do you know what redundancy is? PhD's are degrees dumbass. Though I could tear apart all of your comments word by word, I have to choose the areas that most entertain me. I'm sure you understand.

there·fore [thair-fawr, -fohr] Show IPA
adverb
in consequence of that; as a result; consequently: I think; therefore I am.


Stop trying so hard to sound intelligent. You'll never win an argument concerning my usage of grammar. Niggas know what they're talking about. Fuck are you like 15?

Of COURSE therefore works in that context. It works 1,000%

The example sentence is "I think, therefore I am"

I think, therefore(as a result), I am

They win, therefore(as a result) they write history to their liking

& There is no redundancy in saying PhDs and degrees.. Degrees entails every kind of degree there is pther than PhDs in that context. Associates, Bachelors, Masters, etc..... a PhD is a doctorate degree and the highest degree you can have. For the sake of not listing the lesser degrees, I said PhDs & degrees. And again, degrees entails every other degree that isn't a PhD

You're defiinitely like 15. It's cute though. You're trying too hard to look stupid. Try less.

[Jason]

Originally Posted by Chopsteady

LMAOOOO! Listen bro, that whole "world police" idea came after World War 2. The first notion of it started during the beginning of the cold war when the "war on communism" became a popular in political discussions.
Did you forget about the attacks on Pearl Harbor? The reason for that attack was that the United States had cut off exports to Japan, after they fucked with our allies in Europe. Did you forget that 3 days after the Pearl Harbor attacks, Germany and Italy both declared war on the United States? Were you aware that the United States was much more involved in the conflicts concerning Italy and Japan than they were with Germany, and that it was the Soviet Union who invaded Germany, not the U.S.?

---------- Post added at 12:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:04 AM ----------




It's interesting how you feel that any evidence supporting any claim you are making is indisputable, whereas any evidence supporting the argument is disputable. You say fuck history books because they were all written by winners. Are all winners liars? If so, were the books about black slavery not written by winners? Do you see the flaws in your logic?

i was thinking this same thing but its dangerous territory so i decided to stay away from it. since it was brought up lets examine this thought pulse
if the Holocaust is disputable because history is written by winners
then whats to say Black people were enslaved at any point in time? according to you history is not reliable and we shouldnt believe it.
so why should anyone have respect for Black History Month? why should white people avoid using the n word??? for all we know ...... it never happened. im sure i could dig up a bunch of "research" saying that Black people didnt suffer as many hardships as we have come to believe. Just as im sure you can find some interviews from Jews in the Holocaust that embellished their story for some camera time. All that does is prove that certain people didnt tell the whole truth, it does not negate the existence of the bigger picture.

anyone denying the existence of either of those tragedies is a total ass clown

and proof of the Holocaust is just a google search away, its very well documented. you need to stop living like everyone is lying to you, your paranoia is gunna fuck up your life.

[ILLoKWENT]

How do we know that the voices in your head tellin u THEYRE OUT TO GET YOU isnt really demons?

[Godbody]

@Jason , the thing is you can't Google your way into finding evidence of the Holocaust happening. You can see some pictures in black and white of camps. You can see pictures of people so skinny their bones are poppin out. You can find pictures of people in barracks. But you can't Google any solid evidence of the Holocaust happening.

EVERY PIECE OF 'EVIDENCE' of the Holocaust happening can easily be produced and fabricated.

Remember how not a single plane was seen hitting the Pentagon? Yet it caught fire and there were scraps of metal all over the floor. & Don't tell me a plane DID hit the Pentagon, because then I'll ask you for video evidence of it happening (there's not 1 video of the plane hitting the Pentagon)
...Shit, I can Google the first moon landing, which people believe to be a hoax made in a movie studio.

So if it's possible the moon landing is a hoax, why can't the Holohoax be one?

Like I said, the winners write history and they write w/e the fuck they want you to know. Next you're gonna say George Washington was the first president even though its a well known fact there were presidents before him.

But why do they teach that he's the first president?


Your ancestors don't know what the fuck was going on @ Mindless & OP... They're passing on stories based on propaganda and fear. I bet not one of them saw a concentration camp or the horrific atrocities we claim the Nazis did. All your grandparents and aunts know is that WWII was breakin out and shit the hit the fan. That's probably why they don't deny the Holocaust. Shit was so chaotic and everyone was out to get Germany for invading Poland and whatnot that in the midst of all the chaos its so easy to fabricate a story that implicates Germany as the biggest war criminal ever. & Obviously the average German citizen doesnt know whats going on so when U.S. boots hit the floor and tell the German citizens that Hitler is systematically killing jews of course they have no choice but to accept it as the truth. If not when the U.S. kicks Germany's door down, then when France & Italy come knockin

Telling me the Holocaust happened without being there, but claiming your aunts and grandmas have stories is the dumbest crock of shit I've read anywhere

I wuznt der when Jesus Christ walked d erf but its dokumented ya he walked on water its dokumented lolzzz my grandma told me d story of d bible so Ima takee her word for it cuz i wasnt there

The fuck? How dumb do ya'll sound

[Jason]

lol you always reference things that are totally irrelevant to the conversation
someone lying in one scenario has NOTHING to do with another scenario

i dont know what to tell you dude
i guess the hundreds of thousands of pages talking about the Holocaust and all the concentration camps with scratches on the walls and allll the Germans admitting they did it and allll the photographs of it happening are alllllll fake and everyonnnnne entertains this fairy tale just for fun .. that sounds logical .. cus pulse says so ... i guess youre just smarter than everyone else

[Indonesia]

Jews aren't a race... so how is that racism @FREAK MC?

[The Ghost of Freak]

@Indonesia , a large percent of Jews are of Easter European ethnicity and share in a value system as a people.

Even if Judaism is a religion and not a race, it has been subject to a specific culture that has in turn produced negative racial stereotypes (Jew's big noses, neurosis, greed, stinginess, etc.)

As far as I'm concerned race is a shitty concept to begin with, as it groups people based on phenotypical differences (color of skin, etc) rather than regional, cultural differences as ethnicity is more likely to do.

Either way you should get the point that Holocaust denying is essentially racist, because you are attempting at revising history to ignore the blatant mass killing of statistical minorities (whether jews, blacks or gypsies).

Is that an acceptable explanation?

---------- Post added at 03:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

@Godbody , My issue is you being clearly connected to the history of Western slavery of African Americans, but evidently its okay to accuse me of being overly sensitive about the Holocaust as a Jew?

I wrote about a family member who I met IN REAL LIFE who told me their Holocaust experience that HAPPENED IN REAL LIFE.... fuck a text book that was straight from the primary source.

How could you downplay one piece of history and ignore another? Your immediate defense was to compare the quality of two of human history's worst modern tragedies...

I would never claim slaver or the Holocaust as being more or less worse than the other... that's a useless judgment seeing as both were awful and killed millions of innocent people.

Next time you come on here and claim something clearly not true, you should think about how it is actually disrespectful. Plus, I am quite sure you didn't even read my whole posts that were real talk.... so get out of here with your fake antagonistic bullshit.

-FREAK-

[Indonesia]

Originally Posted by FREAK MC

@Indonesia , a large percent of Jews are of Easter European ethnicity and share in a value system as a people.

Even if Judaism is a religion and not a race, it has been subject to a specific culture that has in turn produced negative racial stereotypes (Jew's big noses, neurosis, greed, stinginess, etc.)

As far as I'm concerned race is a shitty concept to begin with, as it groups people based on phenotypical differences (color of skin, etc) rather than regional, cultural differences as ethnicity is more likely to do.

Either way you should get the point that Holocaust denying is essentially racist, because you are attempting at revising history to ignore the blatant mass killing of statistical minorities (whether jews, blacks or gypsies).

Is that an acceptable explanation?

---------- Post added at 03:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

@Godbody , My issue is you being clearly connected to the history of Western slavery of African Americans, but evidently its okay to accuse me of being overly sensitive about the Holocaust as a Jew?

I wrote about a family member who I met IN REAL LIFE who told me their Holocaust experience that HAPPENED IN REAL LIFE.... fuck a text book that was straight from the primary source.

How could you downplay one piece of history and ignore another? Your immediate defense was to compare the quality of two of human history's worst modern tragedies...

I would never claim slaver or the Holocaust as being more or less worse than the other... that's a useless judgment seeing as both were awful and killed millions of innocent people.

Next time you come on here and claim something clearly not true, you should think about how it is actually disrespectful. Plus, I am quite sure you didn't even read my whole posts that were real talk.... so get out of here with your fake antagonistic bullshit.

-FREAK-

it's not really a good explanation at all, but it is all you can come up with. You just said that Jews aren't a race of people and Jews even hate being called a "race" if you ask them its offensive. and "blacks" are a race, a minority race in America. I just think you are blurring the lines of racism and you cant do that

[The Ghost of Freak]

@Indonesia , by not seeing my point, I think you are blurring my intentions for the use of the word racism. I'm referring to concentrated hate directed at a minority group of people.

Even if jews are not a race they are certainly a minority group of people with a shared culture.

If the word "racism" isnt the correct word then so be it, but what word would you like me to use?

I like how you can bog down an emotional point with an irrelevant, yet logical semantic argument.

I don't care if it isn't racism per say, but its something close to it.... If you can't see that point than you are being intolerant and unreceptive, which I can't change.

-FREAK-