A question about 'swaying'

[Jason]

Originally Posted by FAME

I'm definitely in agreement with this.

I suppose it does come down to who else is gonna vote on the battle though.

As OSKAR said, it's not uncommon for 'noobs' to just look at the comments and decide who to vote for based on that alone.

if someone is going to decide to vote based off other voters .. its better that they steal the vote from someone who explained it and actually tried to vote properly rather than blindly voting though so .. either way i dont see how its a problem

[FAME]

Originally Posted by Jason

if someone is going to decide to vote based off other voters .. its better that they steal the vote from someone who explained it and actually tried to vote properly rather than blindly voting though so .. either way i dont see how its a problem

Never actually thought about it like that tbh

[OSKAR]

well there we go...

Argument Destroyed

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Jason

swaying in my eyes is a blatant attempt to push voters in a certain direction .. if youre just explaining the reason why you voted for a person and drop their name i would never call that swaying ... if people are so busy reading the comments of other voters they should just read the battle and make their own decision

1/

[J u s T C]

If you take time out of you're day to breakdown a verse and offer advice then it is only right you should be able to name names, in fact naming names should be encouraged so either battler knows exactly who you're talking about in order to take what you say on board so they can use it to improve.