| |
05-11-2012, 06:47 AM
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 345
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Seems like most of you are referring to a "ladder" system. Case's Ladder System comes to mind. I'm not sure how realistic it would be to implement, but without getting heavily into details, it basically works like the professional chess rating system. If you beat somebody below you, you only get a win, your rank doesn't change. If you beat somebody above you, you move up HALF of the distance between your rankings.
Examples: If you are ranked 30, and you beat the guy in 95th, you just get a win, but you stay #30. If you are ranked 50 and you beat 49, you swap places. If you're #3 and beat #1, you move to #2. If you're #600 and beat #1, you move to 300.
Basically, it eliminates "newbie bashing" for rank, and gives incentive to battle people better than you. The system itself provides an ideal ranking system. I just don't know how hard it would be to implement something like that. However, I *do* know that the actual mathematical formula is available online. If, by chance, LetsBeef is interested in checkin' it out, let me know and I can send you in the right direction.
Last edited by Phonocide; 05-11-2012 at 06:50 AM.
|
|
05-11-2012, 06:47 AM
|
#11
|
|
Basic Member
   Basic Text Record
229 Points / 15 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2009
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 345
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Seems like most of you are referring to a "ladder" system. Case's Ladder System comes to mind. I'm not sure how realistic it would be to implement, but without getting heavily into details, it basically works like the professional chess rating system. If you beat somebody below you, you only get a win, your rank doesn't change. If you beat somebody above you, you move up HALF of the distance between your rankings.
Examples: If you are ranked 30, and you beat the guy in 95th, you just get a win, but you stay #30. If you are ranked 50 and you beat 49, you swap places. If you're #3 and beat #1, you move to #2. If you're #600 and beat #1, you move to 300.
Basically, it eliminates "newbie bashing" for rank, and gives incentive to battle people better than you. The system itself provides an ideal ranking system. I just don't know how hard it would be to implement something like that. However, I *do* know that the actual mathematical formula is available online. If, by chance, LetsBeef is interested in checkin' it out, let me know and I can send you in the right direction.
Last edited by Phonocide; 05-11-2012 at 06:50 AM.
|
|
Offline
|
|
05-11-2012, 07:12 AM
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,815
Mentioned: 837 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
That points system is already around though. You beat someone thats a way higher rank you get more points
vs beating someone thats closer to you or lower than you in rank
My idea redefines the whole game and is the closest you can get to having a true skill-based ranking system
|
05-11-2012, 07:26 AM
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,723
Mentioned: 616 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)
|
Yeah I'm digging Phroxens Idea.
|
05-11-2012, 11:51 AM
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,990
Mentioned: 3594 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
|
We already have a points based system. The main thing that is different about Phroxen's suggestion is making it overt where people can see exactly how much points they would gain/lose by battling someone.
|
05-11-2012, 12:48 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,815
Mentioned: 837 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
People keep co-signing "Phroxen's idea" as if that idea hasn't been on the site for the past 6 years..lulz
& on a side note...
of all people, a MOD doesn't know how the ranking system works? shame on you Just C
|
05-11-2012, 01:24 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,400
Mentioned: 2106 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)
|
Maybe Someone Should Ask X Or Pugz How The System Currently Works And We Can Go From There Lol Y'all Tryna Fix Something Without Knowing The Inner Workings Is Like Banging The TV When It Doesn't Work
|
05-12-2012, 12:18 AM
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,341
Mentioned: 2692 Post(s)
Tagged: 57 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pU1Se
People keep co-signing "Phroxen's idea" as if that idea hasn't been on the site for the past 6 years..lulz
|
lol, how would we know its been on the site,? show me where to look it up, and how many points i get for beating or losing to certain opponents...
|
05-12-2012, 02:36 AM
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,815
Mentioned: 837 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
It's easy... I battled somebody that was way higher in rank than me this month
I had gotten more points for that battle than I would've for battling someone else.
You can do it yourself
Write down the amount of points you have, battle someone with a wack rank, you'll get a FEW points.
Battle someone with a higher rank, you'll get more points.
|
05-12-2012, 04:27 PM
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,707
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
|
pulse ya idea is dumb cause shitty people can vote for shitty people and rate them 10s
or dudes can vote dope verses 7's just because they hating .
that chess ladder is the best idea in here
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
,
|
|
|
|
|
|
,
|
|
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 PM.
|
|
|
AUDIO
TEXT
Battle Feed
Linear Mode
