Discontinuing One Bar King - Lets Beef

#1 06-03-2016, 12:17 PM

Any objections?

for those who are unfamiliar what this is, it was an exclusive PPV event/league that was ran by NOBLE, and Lockhart currently holds the title for that.

06-03-2016, 12:17 PM

Any objections?

for those who are unfamiliar what this is, it was an exclusive PPV event/league that was ran by NOBLE, and Lockhart currently holds the title for that.

**Thaa MaCc Era** · #2 06-03-2016, 12:49 PM

I Don't Disagree But Are U Gonna Replace it With Another Tourney???

**Thaa MaCc Era** · 06-03-2016, 12:49 PM

I Don't Disagree But Are U Gonna Replace it With Another Tourney???

#3 06-03-2016, 01:01 PM

Make Lock reply to my one bar challenge for the title

And then discontinué

Lol

06-03-2016, 01:01 PM

Make Lock reply to my one bar challenge for the title

And then discontinué

Lol

**Manhattan** · #4 06-03-2016, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papi

Make Lock reply to my one bar challenge for the title

And then discontinué

Lol

You weren't even set up to battle lock for the title...you lost to Coffin Dodger and Shodan...why tf would you get a title shot

**Manhattan** · 06-03-2016, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papi

Make Lock reply to my one bar challenge for the title

And then discontinué

Lol

You weren't even set up to battle lock for the title...you lost to Coffin Dodger and Shodan...why tf would you get a title shot

**S O U L R I T E** · #5 06-03-2016, 04:22 PM

I'm like 4-0 in that tournament and still haven't received my title shot.

Furthermore, I disagree with this idea for the simple reason that there is no just reason. Discontinuing or vacating any title that someone has earned just for the hell of it isn't a good move, and it doesn't seem fair. Just my opinion.

**S O U L R I T E** · 06-03-2016, 04:22 PM

I'm like 4-0 in that tournament and still haven't received my title shot.

Furthermore, I disagree with this idea for the simple reason that there is no just reason. Discontinuing or vacating any title that someone has earned just for the hell of it isn't a good move, and it doesn't seem fair. Just my opinion.

#6 06-03-2016, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alceaus

I'm like 4-0 in that tournament and still haven't received my title shot.

Furthermore, I disagree with this idea for the simple reason that there is no just reason. Discontinuing or vacating any title that someone has earned just for the hell of it isn't a good move, and it doesn't seem fair. Just my opinion.

first: its one bar, hardly any effort to earn
second: title has been passsed around via no-shows
third : title holder is inactive
fourth : whole PPV is inactive
fifth: founder of it and person who ran it is inactive.

06-03-2016, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alceaus

I'm like 4-0 in that tournament and still haven't received my title shot.

Furthermore, I disagree with this idea for the simple reason that there is no just reason. Discontinuing or vacating any title that someone has earned just for the hell of it isn't a good move, and it doesn't seem fair. Just my opinion.

first: its one bar, hardly any effort to earn
second: title has been passsed around via no-shows
third : title holder is inactive
fourth : whole PPV is inactive
fifth: founder of it and person who ran it is inactive.

**S O U L R I T E** · #7 06-03-2016, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Row

first: its one bar, hardly any effort to earn
second: title has been passsed around via no-shows
third : title holder is inactive
fourth : whole PPV is inactive
fifth: founder of it and person who ran it is inactive.

Touche my nigga touche.....

First, the type of battle it is shouldn't really matter. One bar in texting can make or break an entire verse. Bars are just as important as whole verses, seeing as how bars make up verses. So to have a tournament dubbing someone as the one-bar champion seems like a legitimate title.

Second, If the title has been awarded because of no-shows then I understand the frustration of literally handing the title to someone. No argument there. Totally understandable.

Third, like any champion, if they're inactive, it should be stripped. Point blank period.

Fourth, the PPV being inactive can easily be fixed by holding another tournament. That's an easy fix.

Fifth, finding someone to run the tournament shouldn't be too hard either. Just ask someone who you feel is the best fit for getting the job done.

**S O U L R I T E** · 06-03-2016, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Row

first: its one bar, hardly any effort to earn
second: title has been passsed around via no-shows
third : title holder is inactive
fourth : whole PPV is inactive
fifth: founder of it and person who ran it is inactive.

Touche my nigga touche.....

First, the type of battle it is shouldn't really matter. One bar in texting can make or break an entire verse. Bars are just as important as whole verses, seeing as how bars make up verses. So to have a tournament dubbing someone as the one-bar champion seems like a legitimate title.

Second, If the title has been awarded because of no-shows then I understand the frustration of literally handing the title to someone. No argument there. Totally understandable.

Third, like any champion, if they're inactive, it should be stripped. Point blank period.

Fourth, the PPV being inactive can easily be fixed by holding another tournament. That's an easy fix.

Fifth, finding someone to run the tournament shouldn't be too hard either. Just ask someone who you feel is the best fit for getting the job done.