Killz's Scheme Verse - Page 5 - Lets Beef

**ViTRiOL** · #41 04-07-2012, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C

no I'm not nit picking at all I'm stating the obvious when talking to somebody who is talking about K only used 2 syllables due to stressed n in stressed multi's, your pointing the finger at the wrong guy. Why are you always trying to get my attention on some dumb shit?

Cut that shit out.

Yeah, because I want your attention.

You were being stupid, simple as.

**ViTRiOL** · 04-07-2012, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C

no I'm not nit picking at all I'm stating the obvious when talking to somebody who is talking about K only used 2 syllables due to stressed n in stressed multi's, your pointing the finger at the wrong guy. Why are you always trying to get my attention on some dumb shit?

Cut that shit out.

Yeah, because I want your attention.

You were being stupid, simple as.

**Erupt** · #42 04-07-2012, 12:19 PM

For future ref. Y o u need to rhyme every syllable in a skeme battle regarding syllables... also i think there should have been a set number... not 1-3. Just 3..

**Erupt** · 04-07-2012, 12:19 PM

For future ref. Y o u need to rhyme every syllable in a skeme battle regarding syllables... also i think there should have been a set number... not 1-3. Just 3..

IV · #43 04-07-2012, 12:21 PM

@Erupt I thought it was 1-3 as well but if you read it again it actually says

Round 1 - 3 syllables

IV · 04-07-2012, 12:21 PM

@Erupt I thought it was 1-3 as well but if you read it again it actually says

Round 1 - 3 syllables

**Krhyme Killz** · #44 04-07-2012, 12:22 PM

if anyone can point out a multi set that didnt rhyme i'll give you mad props...

and i aint fuck up... i asked twice yo

**Krhyme Killz** · 04-07-2012, 12:22 PM

if anyone can point out a multi set that didnt rhyme i'll give you mad props...

and i aint fuck up... i asked twice yo

**Phroxen** · #45 04-07-2012, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C

But he rhet said 3 syllables and that was the rule K broken because he used 4 in the L..B text style of capping multi's, whether he fully rhymed or not doesn't matter, he still attempted to do a 4 syll scheme, I'm not concerned with his failure to execute the scheme that is irrelevant to the situation. I get what your saying in regards to judging his skill as a textcee when sticking to a certain scheme but it has nothing to do with the point at hand.

Okay. Obviously this isn't sinking in lmao. Capping syllables.. "style".. LB texting.. none of that has anything to do with what anyone is arguing. You're missing the point of this thread completely, and are going off on weird ass tangents to defend him for some reason. I'm not judging his skill at text, nor his ability to stick to a scheme. He stuck to his scheme just fine. He's also good at text. The argument is how he used his scheme, and specifically how he chose to layout his scheme. I'm out of town.. my thread will come later.. for now, I'm tired of talking in circles.

**Phroxen** · 04-07-2012, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C

But he rhet said 3 syllables and that was the rule K broken because he used 4 in the L..B text style of capping multi's, whether he fully rhymed or not doesn't matter, he still attempted to do a 4 syll scheme, I'm not concerned with his failure to execute the scheme that is irrelevant to the situation. I get what your saying in regards to judging his skill as a textcee when sticking to a certain scheme but it has nothing to do with the point at hand.

Okay. Obviously this isn't sinking in lmao. Capping syllables.. "style".. LB texting.. none of that has anything to do with what anyone is arguing. You're missing the point of this thread completely, and are going off on weird ass tangents to defend him for some reason. I'm not judging his skill at text, nor his ability to stick to a scheme. He stuck to his scheme just fine. He's also good at text. The argument is how he used his scheme, and specifically how he chose to layout his scheme. I'm out of town.. my thread will come later.. for now, I'm tired of talking in circles.

**Just C** · #46 04-07-2012, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViTRiOL

Yeah, because I want your attention.

You were being stupid, simple as.

Then why are people agreeing with me?

Go play on the M1

Last time I adress you.

**Just C** · 04-07-2012, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViTRiOL

Yeah, because I want your attention.

You were being stupid, simple as.

Then why are people agreeing with me?

Go play on the M1

Last time I adress you.

**ViTRiOL** · #47 04-07-2012, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C

Then why are people agreeing with me?

Go play on the M1

Last time I adress you.

Dude, are you on a Henry Hill coke binge or something?

Phroxen has wronged you twice and so have I. Stop being a fucking retard.

**ViTRiOL** · 04-07-2012, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C

Then why are people agreeing with me?

Go play on the M1

Last time I adress you.

Dude, are you on a Henry Hill coke binge or something?

Phroxen has wronged you twice and so have I. Stop being a fucking retard.

**Phroxen** · #48 04-07-2012, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Itz Killz

if anyone can point out a multi set that didnt rhyme i'll give you mad props...

and i aint fuck up... i asked twice yo

This is exactly what I'm going to do later. Just to help smooth this shit out.

**Phroxen** · 04-07-2012, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Itz Killz

if anyone can point out a multi set that didnt rhyme i'll give you mad props...

and i aint fuck up... i asked twice yo

This is exactly what I'm going to do later. Just to help smooth this shit out.

**Just C** · #49 04-07-2012, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phroxen

Okay. Obviously this isn't sinking in lmao. Capping syllables.. "style".. LB texting.. none of that has anything to do with what anyone is arguing. You're missing the point of this thread completely, and are going off on weird ass tangents to defend him for some reason. I'm not judging his skill at text, nor his ability to stick to a scheme. He stuck to his scheme just fine. He's also good at text. The argument is how he used his scheme, and specifically how he chose to layout his scheme. I'm out of town.. my thread will come later.. for now, I'm tired of talking in circles.

smh...... for the first time in a long time I can't even be fucked arguing and beating this dead horse. Do you I'll do me, we'll both live to fight another day.

---------- Post added at 11:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:27 AM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phroxen

Okay. Obviously this isn't sinking in lmao. Capping syllables.. "style".. LB texting.. none of that has anything to do with what anyone is arguing. You're missing the point of this thread completely, and are going off on weird ass tangents to defend him for some reason. I'm not judging his skill at text, nor his ability to stick to a scheme. He stuck to his scheme just fine. He's also good at text. The argument is how he used his scheme, and specifically how he chose to layout his scheme. I'm out of town.. my thread will come later.. for now, I'm tired of talking in circles.

Sigh/

....

And don't take offence to that I just can't be fucked. If my point hasn't sunk I'm yet then chances are it never will so I'm a leave it.

**Just C** · 04-07-2012, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phroxen

Okay. Obviously this isn't sinking in lmao. Capping syllables.. "style".. LB texting.. none of that has anything to do with what anyone is arguing. You're missing the point of this thread completely, and are going off on weird ass tangents to defend him for some reason. I'm not judging his skill at text, nor his ability to stick to a scheme. He stuck to his scheme just fine. He's also good at text. The argument is how he used his scheme, and specifically how he chose to layout his scheme. I'm out of town.. my thread will come later.. for now, I'm tired of talking in circles.

smh...... for the first time in a long time I can't even be fucked arguing and beating this dead horse. Do you I'll do me, we'll both live to fight another day.

---------- Post added at 11:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:27 AM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phroxen

Okay. Obviously this isn't sinking in lmao. Capping syllables.. "style".. LB texting.. none of that has anything to do with what anyone is arguing. You're missing the point of this thread completely, and are going off on weird ass tangents to defend him for some reason. I'm not judging his skill at text, nor his ability to stick to a scheme. He stuck to his scheme just fine. He's also good at text. The argument is how he used his scheme, and specifically how he chose to layout his scheme. I'm out of town.. my thread will come later.. for now, I'm tired of talking in circles.

Sigh/

....

And don't take offence to that I just can't be fucked. If my point hasn't sunk I'm yet then chances are it never will so I'm a leave it.

**ViTRiOL** · #50 04-07-2012, 12:32 PM

Haha, I think this is Just C's best performance of ignorance and denial that I've seen in a long time.

**ViTRiOL** · 04-07-2012, 12:32 PM

Haha, I think this is Just C's best performance of ignorance and denial that I've seen in a long time.

,

,


	Start a battle Audio or Text or Video Vote on a battle to earn +5 credit!