|
05-31-2013, 09:34 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
^That was what I said when NOBLE mentioned it. It'd remain a contest of 'who the better rapper is'.
|
05-31-2013, 09:34 PM
|
#31
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
^That was what I said when NOBLE mentioned it. It'd remain a contest of 'who the better rapper is'.
|
|
|
06-01-2013, 12:26 AM
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,990
Mentioned: 3594 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
|
It's like the difference between reading a book and watching a movie. You can read in a book that a guy walks into a bar and comes across a midget. You sort of have to use your own imagination in conjunction with what the author has written to imagine how that guy and the midget look.
If you watched it on film, it would be a specific guy/actor, a specific midget, and a specific set...so it's less dependent on your imagination cause you're looking at it. That's sort of the difference between reading a topical and hearing it. Words sometimes vary in meaning depending on how they are conveyed. When reading a topical, you have to sub-vocalize it and even create the timing and pace on your own. No matter how beautiful the piece is or how well it is written, to a certain extent, you may be giving the author more credit than they are due because most of the picture that's formed comes from your own imagination.
When it is vocalized, you get that other dimension. You get more of a sense of the conviction behind the words. And yes, that would be something that voters would judge too, and I guess that's what you're trying to avoid. But in a way, it's actually more of a true measure of a topical writer/poet. Reading and vocalizing a topical out loud CAN translate well, but it might just take a bit more work on the part of both the writer as well as the audience.
|
06-01-2013, 12:26 AM
|
#32
|
Basic Audio Record 59 Points / 4 Won / 0 Lost
Basic Text Record 342 Points / 30 Won / 8 Lost
Join Date: May 2011
Voted:
406
audio / 1042
text
Posts: 5,990
Mentioned: 3594 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
|
It's like the difference between reading a book and watching a movie. You can read in a book that a guy walks into a bar and comes across a midget. You sort of have to use your own imagination in conjunction with what the author has written to imagine how that guy and the midget look.
If you watched it on film, it would be a specific guy/actor, a specific midget, and a specific set...so it's less dependent on your imagination cause you're looking at it. That's sort of the difference between reading a topical and hearing it. Words sometimes vary in meaning depending on how they are conveyed. When reading a topical, you have to sub-vocalize it and even create the timing and pace on your own. No matter how beautiful the piece is or how well it is written, to a certain extent, you may be giving the author more credit than they are due because most of the picture that's formed comes from your own imagination.
When it is vocalized, you get that other dimension. You get more of a sense of the conviction behind the words. And yes, that would be something that voters would judge too, and I guess that's what you're trying to avoid. But in a way, it's actually more of a true measure of a topical writer/poet. Reading and vocalizing a topical out loud CAN translate well, but it might just take a bit more work on the part of both the writer as well as the audience.
|
Offline
|
|
06-01-2013, 03:29 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,018
Mentioned: 1298 Post(s)
Tagged: 51 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBLE
It's like the difference between reading a book and watching a movie. You can read in a book that a guy walks into a bar and comes across a midget. You sort of have to use your own imagination in conjunction with what the author has written to imagine how that guy and the midget look.
If you watched it on film, it would be a specific guy/actor, a specific midget, and a specific set...so it's less dependent on your imagination cause you're looking at it. That's sort of the difference between reading a topical and hearing it. Words sometimes vary in meaning depending on how they are conveyed. When reading a topical, you have to sub-vocalize it and even create the timing and pace on your own. No matter how beautiful the piece is or how well it is written, to a certain extent, you may be giving the author more credit than they are due because most of the picture that's formed comes from your own imagination.
When it is vocalized, you get that other dimension. You get more of a sense of the conviction behind the words. And yes, that would be something that voters would judge too, and I guess that's what you're trying to avoid. But in a way, it's actually more of a true measure of a topical writer/poet. Reading and vocalizing a topical out loud CAN translate well, but it might just take a bit more work on the part of both the writer as well as the audience.
|
Giving that "extra dimension" takes away a huge factor of poetry.. giving the reader the chance to use their imagination and actually think and interpret the material in their own way. You're just reading out a story in audio.
|
06-01-2013, 03:29 PM
|
#33
|
Live Battler
Basic Audio Record 54 Points / 4 Won / 1 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 0 Points / Won / Lost
Basic Text Record 1979 Points / 153 Won / 28 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 53 Points / 3 Won / 0 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2006
Voted:
0 audio / 1239
text
Posts: 6,018
Mentioned: 1298 Post(s)
Tagged: 51 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBLE
It's like the difference between reading a book and watching a movie. You can read in a book that a guy walks into a bar and comes across a midget. You sort of have to use your own imagination in conjunction with what the author has written to imagine how that guy and the midget look.
If you watched it on film, it would be a specific guy/actor, a specific midget, and a specific set...so it's less dependent on your imagination cause you're looking at it. That's sort of the difference between reading a topical and hearing it. Words sometimes vary in meaning depending on how they are conveyed. When reading a topical, you have to sub-vocalize it and even create the timing and pace on your own. No matter how beautiful the piece is or how well it is written, to a certain extent, you may be giving the author more credit than they are due because most of the picture that's formed comes from your own imagination.
When it is vocalized, you get that other dimension. You get more of a sense of the conviction behind the words. And yes, that would be something that voters would judge too, and I guess that's what you're trying to avoid. But in a way, it's actually more of a true measure of a topical writer/poet. Reading and vocalizing a topical out loud CAN translate well, but it might just take a bit more work on the part of both the writer as well as the audience.
|
Giving that "extra dimension" takes away a huge factor of poetry.. giving the reader the chance to use their imagination and actually think and interpret the material in their own way. You're just reading out a story in audio.
|
Offline
|
|
06-01-2013, 04:00 PM
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,952
Mentioned: 838 Post(s)
Tagged: 49 Thread(s)
|
Really? I'm am not reading four pages of ur two disagreeing like a married couple
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarzILLA
I have a gay friend
|
|
06-02-2013, 07:40 AM
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,615
Mentioned: 869 Post(s)
Tagged: 67 Thread(s)
|
Eth has a point, but topicals can translate to audio just like regular battles do; you need to have the delivery as well as the content. Sure, someone might have a better story but not deliver it well and that'll cost them the battle; same as standard battling. You have to have that other aspect in your arsenal when partaking in any audio contest. The only real issue I think it poses is accent barriers (as seen with myself and IV in the first audio topical tourney).
|
06-02-2013, 11:35 AM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
@ Askari, we need a national accent audio, you sheep shagging wank shaft.
Completely agree with Askari that it adds more elements. The difference between text battling and topicals to me, that makes a big difference here, is that I really classify topical makers as WRITERS. Telling a writer they aren't good enough because their audio delivery was bad would be harsh to me.
|
06-02-2013, 11:35 AM
|
#36
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
@ Askari, we need a national accent audio, you sheep shagging wank shaft.
Completely agree with Askari that it adds more elements. The difference between text battling and topicals to me, that makes a big difference here, is that I really classify topical makers as WRITERS. Telling a writer they aren't good enough because their audio delivery was bad would be harsh to me.
|
|
|
06-02-2013, 01:28 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,018
Mentioned: 1298 Post(s)
Tagged: 51 Thread(s)
|
Yeah, text battles are rips of normal battling for people that don't wanna actually rap for whatever reasons, topicals are MEANT to be written, so why add in a "who has the better accent" element for something that was suppose to be read and show off writing skills
|
06-02-2013, 01:29 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
"Storytelling Tournament" would be a better classification of the audio topical tournament.
|
06-02-2013, 01:29 PM
|
#38
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
"Storytelling Tournament" would be a better classification of the audio topical tournament.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
,
|
|
|
,
|
|
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.
|
|
|