Idea To Make Voting and FVC Better

[AfterThought]

Here's a gem: Just because somebody is a dope battler, doesnt mean he a good voter.

[Manhattan]

Cosign with @ILLoKWENT and @AfterThought Plus the FVC is filled w/ knowledgeable voters or else they wouldn't have been selected. It would be nice to see more members trying to become FVC. It would be dope to have 10 or so at a time.

[Joe MuGGz]

Boom..

Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT

Lol.. i listed every mod and fvc member on the UVT..the problem isnt just finding dope heads to vote..the problem is the consistency in dropping votes..HOF aint active so at most theyd vote far and between if your lucky... the dopest battlers here dont have time or want the responsibility of answering requests month in and month out...which is why wearing an fvc is sopposed to be a badge of responsibility in answering the UVT as much as possible...and at the same time being good at critiquing

[Paroemiographer]

Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT

Lol.. i listed every mod and fvc member on the UVT..the problem isnt just finding dope heads to vote..the problem is the consistency in dropping votes..HOF aint active so at most theyd vote far and between if your lucky... the dopest battlers here dont have time or want the responsibility of answering requests month in and month out...which is why wearing an fvc is sopposed to be a badge of responsibility in answering the UVT as much as possible...and at the same time being good at critiquing

I hear you, but the consistency would improve if it were all up to the Fair Voters and there were a strict policy. Eliminate rating as a whole for everyone except the FVC. Make one thread only for links to be posted for all Fair Voters to vote upon. If a certain percentage/amount isn't reached by all voters, ones who haven't reached that quota are to be either taken out, or given an infraction/warning. Bet battles would receive more votes in general.

[Student]

There simply isn't enough FVC members to complete such a change. If you say "oh just add more members then" it isn't that simple, FVC members are specifically chosen because they're exceptional voters and currently active. It simply wouldn't be fair to carry all the battles on this website just because they're good voters. You have to remember they're also battling, posting in the forums, making tracks, have real life social lives, etc.

[Paroemiographer]

Originally Posted by Student

There simply isn't enough FVC members to complete such a change. If you say "oh just add more members then" it isn't that simple, FVC members are specifically chosen because they're exceptional voters and currently active. It simply wouldn't be fair to carry all the battles on this website just because they're good voters. You have to remember they're also battling, posting in the forums, making tracks, have real life social lives, etc.

That's where you got it twisted. The responsibility of voting wouldn't entirely be up to the FVC just the rating of each emcee in a battle. Others would just have to choose the winner of each battle in order to get credits. The FVC would be there for people who are curious on where they're at skill-wise. Maybe offer 2 extra credits when they rate each skill of each battler (wordplay, metaphors, vocabulary, punchlines, multis) .4 credits each but they have to rate each and every skill of each battler so they'd get a total of 3 credits, which is what's required to battle, off rating just one battle alone. This will push them to want to work harder to remain a FVC member and members who are wanting to become a part of the FVC even more to become a FVC member. Also, for those who become frequent at rating skills will get better as battlers and become more knowledgeable on what it takes to be an all-around good emcee.

Battles would reach the Hot list based off number of votes, not rates. Think about it. What wins the Heisman? What wins presidential elections? The highest number of votes. Correct? @NOBLE @Pugz

[Paroemiographer]

@Hastur
@Bleu
@ELOH_STACKz
@MadVerbs
@Babylon
@Glo
@Subreal
@2FUEL
@AfterThought
@ILLoKWENT
@Manhattan
@Murderous Swag
@Row
@Stotty Pimpin
@stricc
@Student
@V3numb

[Subreal]

The mini-ratings on battles are dead. no one votes on the multis,metaphores,punchlines,voacb, wordplay things. everyone just gives the standard 0-10 for both. I don't know why you're so obsessed with the mini-ratings. If you want to learn what you need to work on read your expos or hit up someone that will answer ur questions n help u elevate

[Paroemiographer]

Originally Posted by Subreal

The mini-ratings on battles are dead. no one votes on the multis,metaphores,punchlines,voacb, wordplay things. everyone just gives the standard 0-10 for both. I don't know why you're so obsessed with the mini-ratings. If you want to learn what you need to work on read your expos or hit up someone that will answer ur questions n help u elevate

But what if they did though? Not just everyone, but the Fair Voters. This would be a privilege for them to earn more credits. Every time they rate all 5 categories for both emcees, they'd receive two credits on top of the one credit they already get for rating the emcees alone on ONE BATTLE ALONE which is enough to battle. Think about it. It's 3 credits per 3 credits, really.

---------- Post added at 05:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:54 PM ----------

Every 2-3 months have like a FVC Tournament depending on the dedication of each member and how long they are able to sustain their quota every month.