Tyson Owns Interviewer

[Jason]

Originally Posted by Craig Low

If you invite someone on to your show and say hey we are going to do this interview your in town and your shows here so you represent the the interview as being a "friendly" one. Which is what that station and interviewer did.

im sorry.

in your experience, are interviewers typically unfriendly people?




seriously, out of all the people who's word you can blindly quote as scripture .. mike tyons's isnt the one

[Craig Low]

whos quoting tyson as scripture? and yes most times in a situation like that interviews are friendly. Like i pointed out both parties get something mike gets to plug his show and the station gets to sell more adds that hour because hes on there. Its called reciprocity. You give a lil sumthn you get alil sumthn every one leaves happy. If thats not the case be upfront and say hey Mike we are gonna say your a rapist on national tv ok, so be ready since we are selling 5 times the adds this half hour that we normally do because "Mike Tyson" is on the damn show. Its not cool just to set people up to get fucked on live national tv then trip when they get a lil fuckn offended and speak their mind.

---------- Post added at 12:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:06 AM ----------

And by the way whats up with your avitar dude ? I mean whats really going on here cause thats some gay lookn shit. I am a narcissist so I have my pic up but dude thats some fruity shit goin on there man.

[NOBLE]

It doesn't seem like Mike was prepped or knew in advance he would be asked that sort of question. That whole rape situation is something he's probably spent years trying to get over, both legally and in the court of public opinion. In his mind, being asked such a question was probably like having to answer to the rape charges all over again when all he came there to do was plug his new show. Not saying it wasn't a fair question to ask---and the interviewer did phrase it as "some people would say....how would you respond to that" so it didn't seem like he was going at Mike personally. I think other people who know they will always be questioned about some past ordeal no matter how much they try to put it behind might have handled it differently, but Mike's personality isn't of that sort and the interviewer should have taken that into account.

[Jason]

Originally Posted by Craig Low

whos quoting tyson as scripture? and yes most times in a situation like that interviews are friendly. Like i pointed out both parties get something mike gets to plug his show and the station gets to sell more adds that hour because hes on there. Its called reciprocity. You give a lil sumthn you get alil sumthn every one leaves happy. If thats not the case be upfront and say hey Mike we are gonna say your a rapist on national tv ok, so be ready since we are selling 5 times the adds this half hour that we normally do because "Mike Tyson" is on the damn show. Its not cool just to set people up to get fucked on live national tv then trip when they get a lil fuckn offended and speak their mind.

---------- Post added at 12:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:06 AM ----------

And by the way whats up with your avitar dude ? I mean whats really going on here cause thats some gay lookn shit. I am a narcissist so I have my pic up but dude thats some fruity shit goin on there man.

youre bringing up the interviewer being friendly like it is somehow relevant to the conversation.. the only reason you think that is relevant info is cus mike tyson said it when he was angry. every interviewer is friendly wtf lmao .. you think theyre gunna put an angry interviewer in the room with a celebrity? i dont understand.
interviewers are friendly and inviting by nature .. thats the entire reason why they are interviewers...because they get people to open up and speak about themselves ... tha fuck? lmao

they didnt "set him to get fucked" at all ... in the world of politics this is a very standard type of question .. mike tyson is just a baby with absolutely no ability to control his anger whatsoever .. which is probably why the accusation is true in the first place

its not like he exposed some great secret in his life ... HE SERVED YEARS IN JAIL FOR THIS CRIME lol .. its common knowledge .. christ

people are so whiny

[J u s T C]

You need to watch that video I posted Jason. Seems like Tyson got screwed over.

[Dono]

I think he meant A friendly interview as opposed to a serious or deep one.
Not so much the personality of the interviewer himself.

It's common courtesy before an interview to review the kinds of questions you'll be asking. Sometimes boundaries are set up. Clearly not the case here. Mike's response wasn't professional in any way and he should be able to handle himself without blowing up but a blindside question can be off putting as well.

Just looks like some bad communication to me.

[J u s T C]

3 witnsses to her kissing Tyson in the limo before they went to his room were denied the chance to testify as witnesses.

If she pulled away from him in the limo when he made his advances on her why did she then follow him to his room at 3 am just moments after she supposidly rejected him?

Only to reject him again when in the hotel room she followed him to after rejecting him already in the limo, walk into the bathroom and take her panty liner off with him in the next room in just his underpants?

Really? Thats your next move? She obviously didn't feel threatened by him and was getting ready to sleep with him and was necking with him in the limo prior. which there were witnesses to, all female witnesses.

a child hood football sweetheart of hers was also denied the right to take the witness stand to testify that she had told her father that he raped her to cover her tracks after they slept together because of her religion and the resulting possible shit storm of sex before marriage.

How the fuck does this man not get to take the stand. That is VITAL key witness evidence which shows her character, possible family/religious motives for accusing mike. Her father would have eventually found out that she slept with Mike. He was 1 of the most known athletes in the world at the time with a nack of grabbing headlines.

Thats reasonable doubt if ever there was any.

Even the jury have reflected on the case years later and admitted Mike didn't have a fair trial and that if the evidence denied HAD been presented, they'd have found him not guilty.

[Craig Low]

Like the dude dono said, what I meant was it was supposed to be a interview that was friendly in nature, not the dude. Also last time I checked Mike wasnt running for office so your comment about politics makes no sense. Sounds like to me your a man hater bro, I have seen women with your attitude but not any males. More importantly I am still waiting for your response about that gay ass avitar you are rocking. OOOOOHHHHH I get your jealous you didnt get raped by mike ok my bad.

[Godbody]

lol how the fuck ya'll gonna defend the interviewer

the question was very unreasonable to ask...when you think about it, the relationship between mike and the station was mutual. Mike uses it as a platform and that local channel gets more viewership. so if someone walks into your home willing to shoot the shit with you and answer questions..why disrespect him? i'd take offense to some shit like that too. something that mad ppl let go and the interviewer has the nerve to bring it up

& Mike was right in calling him out on the 'some of your critics might say' shit...Mike's thinkin what critics? you're the one calling me a convicted rapist. i came here tryna promote my shit not bring up my past. & why bring up something negative? you would think that if you're giving Mike Tyson a platform to promote something you'd wanna portray him a positive light. not bring something up to throw the vibe off

Mike is a real nigga for that n he kept it 100

As Jason said, Tyson's a loose cannon. He went as far as to say "I really do wish I raped her and her momma".


So in all these years, Tyson hasn't ONCE had an outburst where he said he raped her?