THE CONCEPT OF VP

[SHARK BOY_]

Originally Posted by Manhattan

I can't ever understand why people get so rattled about VP. It's a website....and everyone gets robbed every now and again. When you start up you have a normal VP and once you have proved yourself worthy enough as a voter you may get your vp raised. People have zero or low vp for a reason, because they don't know how to vote or have consistently voted for people who end up losing battles/ hate vote/ low vote/ buddy vote/ sway or simply don't know how to vote. @SHARK_BOY why would anyone have their VP raised because they have over a 70% win ratio? Just because you have a bunch of wins doesn't mean your automatically a good voter. In fact the guys w/ the most battles are usually the shitty voters who just through out an "Uneducated Vote" because they don't have enough credits. That makes absolutely no sense....It doesn't matter how experienced you are if you still don't know how to vote. The mods/admins have thought long and hard and they know what they are doing when it comes to implementing voting power. You win some battles from VP and you lose some....that's just how it goes.

than let them all start from zero.let the noobs earn their vote power.get the neutral line drawn.kids dont walk as soon as their born do they? let them crawl learn and than walk/and you got well over 70%win ratio now is that through experience or some "Uneducated Vote" ? and the style how you vote and the expo you leave comes through simply put "experience" so isnt it obvious you should have an greater vp and an noob should have an zero who has no experience.

---------- Post added at 12:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:05 PM ----------

Originally Posted by UnEtH

Win percentage might mean some nobody has cheated in all his battles to get a good record, so that's irrelevant.

This "noob" with 2VP, his VP hasn't been put up, the other two who must have been proven to be bad voters have been put down. No nobody will be given a higher VP, but people who show bad voting will be put down. It's as simple as that.

hate voters = 0 vp
noobs = 2 vp
since , 2vp = neutal line <<< thats an noob makes the whole system inconsistent, i think its called an neutral line for an reason "zero" is called an origin(starting point)

[The Dope Man]

legit...i got robbed by tain's bitch ass a few months ago too..on a snipe..smh..just cause that mufucka got an exclusive membership

I don't understand how it can be sniping. You guys understand how the site works. If you drop a shit open, and someone picks it up with a better verse, how can you complain?

[Tain]

lol Ive always voted fair...yall say my name to much

[-Apollyon-]

Originally Posted by Tain

lol Ive always voted fair...yall say my name to much

fair voting and educated voting are 2 different things..

[Tain]

educated voting? What about music strikes everyone different. What u think is so so might be somethin I think is amazing. Of course the voting aint gonna make sense sometimes. Yea Yea

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Manhattan

I can't ever understand why people get so rattled about VP. It's a website....and everyone gets robbed every now and again. When you start up you have a normal VP and once you have proved yourself worthy enough as a voter you may get your vp raised. People have zero or low vp for a reason, because they don't know how to vote or have consistently voted for people who end up losing battles/ hate vote/ low vote/ buddy vote/ sway or simply don't know how to vote. @SHARK_BOY why would anyone have their VP raised because they have over a 70% win ratio? Just because you have a bunch of wins doesn't mean your automatically a good voter. In fact the guys w/ the most battles are usually the shitty voters who just through out an "Uneducated Vote" because they don't have enough credits. That makes absolutely no sense....It doesn't matter how experienced you are if you still don't know how to vote. The mods/admins have thought long and hard and they know what they are doing when it comes to implementing voting power. You win some battles from VP and you lose some....that's just how it goes.

This.

VP based on win percentage is a horrible idea. You think the current system is bad?

Lol you don't want that win percentage VP.

[SHARK BOY_]

why is that? i don't hear the reasons

[J u s T C]

Because too many people who have high win percentages and enough battles (you'd need a minimum) to trigger an increase in VP have and still do cheat. They PM. They IM. They sway And more importantly and key, they battle/snipe easy prey. Too many people with a high win percentage fall into that category to make a win percent based VP even slightly viable.

I'd rather trust the opinion of the 10 -20 guy who battled nothing but top quality opponents and held his own than the mediocre m.c who snipes weaker prey 24/7 to pad his record to 100-0

[SHARK BOY_]

hmmm so the guy who is experienced enough to snipe and take an win and cheaters who have been here enough to get dick riders have 0vp.
and noobs who get sniped and sway'ed and cheated prey's have 2vp.
alot makes sense.