Friend or Saviour - Page 2 - Lets Beef

**Fredo Lombardi** · #11 05-03-2013, 05:16 PM

damn this is a really hard question now

**Fredo Lombardi** · 05-03-2013, 05:16 PM

damn this is a really hard question now

**NOBLE** · #12 05-03-2013, 05:29 PM

If the stranger just jumped in front of a bullet 20 minutes earlier, he might not make it anyway. I'd probably help the friend cause he has a greater chance of surviving.

**NOBLE** · 05-03-2013, 05:29 PM

If the stranger just jumped in front of a bullet 20 minutes earlier, he might not make it anyway. I'd probably help the friend cause he has a greater chance of surviving.

#13 05-03-2013, 05:32 PM

Vote/ NOBLE

05-03-2013, 05:32 PM

Vote/ NOBLE

**V3numb** · #14 05-03-2013, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

If the stranger just jumped in front of a bullet 20 minutes earlier, he might not make it anyway. I'd probably help the friend cause he has a greater chance of surviving.

this guy's fucking awesome ahah..

but the guy your letting fall sent me a message for you..

"

"

i just found it on the web and had to use it.....

**V3numb** · 05-03-2013, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

If the stranger just jumped in front of a bullet 20 minutes earlier, he might not make it anyway. I'd probably help the friend cause he has a greater chance of surviving.

this guy's fucking awesome ahah..

but the guy your letting fall sent me a message for you..

"

"

i just found it on the web and had to use it.....

**Fredo Lombardi** · #15 05-03-2013, 05:47 PM

I mean it never said if he was shot could of just been grazed but good point

**Fredo Lombardi** · 05-03-2013, 05:47 PM

I mean it never said if he was shot could of just been grazed but good point

**Jason** · #16 05-03-2013, 06:17 PM

Lol friend. Anyone jumping in front of a bullet for the family of someone they met 20 minutes ago clearly has nothing to live for. Why else would you throw away your life for a total stranger?

Pretty easy question

**Jason** · 05-03-2013, 06:17 PM

Lol friend. Anyone jumping in front of a bullet for the family of someone they met 20 minutes ago clearly has nothing to live for. Why else would you throw away your life for a total stranger?

Pretty easy question

#17 05-03-2013, 06:45 PM

I wouldn't say it goes down like that Jason. If I was in a situation now, say a hostage situation, and the guy was taking a woman, I might say "Take me as a hostage instead". Not even that noble a thing to do, but in the eyes of her family members it would be. So if it went down like that, the guy might have just been doing the right thing over wasting his own life.

05-03-2013, 06:45 PM

I wouldn't say it goes down like that Jason. If I was in a situation now, say a hostage situation, and the guy was taking a woman, I might say "Take me as a hostage instead". Not even that noble a thing to do, but in the eyes of her family members it would be. So if it went down like that, the guy might have just been doing the right thing over wasting his own life.

**Fredo Lombardi** · #18 05-03-2013, 06:54 PM

thats just dumb eth they were right white people risk their lives in stupid situations

no racism of course

**Fredo Lombardi** · 05-03-2013, 06:54 PM

thats just dumb eth they were right white people risk their lives in stupid situations

no racism of course

**NOBLE** · #19 05-03-2013, 07:03 PM

I can see myself risking my life for a total stranger depending on the situation. I guess what's at the heart of the question is would you save someone who has more personal value to you (friend) or more value to society (savior)? Someone who's willing to risk their lives for others (depending on the situation) is more valuable to society to me. But there's no telling that the friend wouldn't have done the same thing if given the opportunity either. What made my decision was the fact that you said the savior had been shot 20 minutes earlier. So I could save him and he still ends up dying from the wound, now we have two dead people rather than just one. In crisis situations like that where you can only save one person or a handful, I've always thought its better to try saving the ones who will have the best chances of surviving afterwards...otherwise you might have wasted your efforts.

**NOBLE** · 05-03-2013, 07:03 PM

I can see myself risking my life for a total stranger depending on the situation. I guess what's at the heart of the question is would you save someone who has more personal value to you (friend) or more value to society (savior)? Someone who's willing to risk their lives for others (depending on the situation) is more valuable to society to me. But there's no telling that the friend wouldn't have done the same thing if given the opportunity either. What made my decision was the fact that you said the savior had been shot 20 minutes earlier. So I could save him and he still ends up dying from the wound, now we have two dead people rather than just one. In crisis situations like that where you can only save one person or a handful, I've always thought its better to try saving the ones who will have the best chances of surviving afterwards...otherwise you might have wasted your efforts.

**Phoenix** · #20 05-03-2013, 07:10 PM

I have 2 hands. I'd pull them both, then push them again.

**Phoenix** · 05-03-2013, 07:10 PM

I have 2 hands. I'd pull them both, then push them again.

,

,


	Start a battle Audio or Text or Video Vote on a battle to earn +5 credit!