EtH Banned.

[Aggo]

Originally Posted by Just C

He went around slandering staff. Thats disrespect. Look I don't give a flying fuck what he says but if were gonna be technical about it. which you are. Rule was right to ban him. If you have a problem with the rules in place you're talking to the wrong people. We didn't make them.

So you do support the rule that you admit was blatent faggotry?

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Agonize

But you were defending the rule and saying RULE was right for enforcing it. But RULE says that that isn't the case. What is the case, im confused by the difference of opinions being presented.

I'm not saying whether he was right or wrong morrally.

But Eth was slandering staff
Thats a form of disrespecting staff.
Thats a bannable offence

So technically/ethically he was right. banned by the rules.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

"EtH's perma-ban status has been reinforced by me due to his constant lies about the actions of the sites staff" - Rule

No Rule, I can read and I can read critically and that's the problem.

Aparentely not.

[Aggo]

So yes, you support what you admit is faggotry. That's an issue.

[AfterThought]

I think the poll numbers speak louder than words.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Agonize

So you do support the rule that you admit was blatent faggotry?

If I supported it I'd be banning people left and right.

But it's a site rule. If another member chooses to enforce it or ban them for something that falls under that category thats on them.

And why are you defending him?

You know he's a troll. whether he helped you or not. You know what he's like and you know full well he does what he does knowing full well what he was getting himself into.

Thats like someone biting, them getting banned, and you feeling sorry for them, then blaming the staff rather than Eth for his own arrogance.

He knew where his actions could end up taking him, they've took him here before.

I don't get it. He's a big boy and he makes his own decisions fully aware of the consequences yet here you are acting like he was oblivious and hard done by. I don't get it

Originally Posted by RULE

Aparentely not.

Originally Posted by Just C

I'm not saying whether he was right or wrong morrally.

But Eth was slandering staff
Thats a form of disrespecting staff.
Thats a bannable offence

So technically/ethically he was right. banned by the rules.

This is simply a matter of us going in circles now. I've succeeded in what I wanted to by making this thread, you can close it if you like. Everyone that isn't a staff member can see the bias in play here and I'm sure some of those on staff agree but can't say anything due to being pressured to conform on the staff forums.

[Aggo]

Originally Posted by AfterThought

I think the poll numbers speak louder than words.

You're right. It's another clear look at the corruption that exists in the staff. Real mature guys.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

This is simply a matter of us going in circles now. I've succeeded in what I wanted to by making this thread, you can close it if you like. Everyone that isn't a staff member can see the bias in play here and I'm sure some of those on staff agree but can't say anything due to being pressured to conform on the staff forums.

You havent succeed in anything but if it means you're leaving then take your success and be gone with you. jesus man your shit is boring. your like Lizman 2.0 or some shit. just go.

@Dysfunctional can you set up a match for the welterweight belt so that punk can have 1?