|
06-19-2014, 02:50 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,815
Mentioned: 837 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
It is opinion based and you're a funny faggot
Exactly what you're doing to my wordplay is what I did to your revision
You can't break & tire a crew without the need to fix a whip
^ Its a solid attempt but no cigar
Like I said I can be a faggot with my dick tucked in between my legs like ViT and pick and choose what to scrutinize all day if I voted for the inferior verse and made ludicrous claims like Vit
I chose to pick and scrutinize your revised version of my bar, which doesn't make sense.
ViT - "how can you break entire crews like novice mechanics in teams?"
^ Point made. You overlooked it and I pointed it out in your rewritten bar then you go back to the original bar to further scrutinize it and plead your case
Shit faggots do
Take it easy home girl
1 day you'll be on my level but its not anytime soon and as far as audio you'll never be on my level so quit while you're ahead
|
06-19-2014, 02:50 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Well tough-shit, fuck-kid my RHMYES TOO DOPE/ I wouldn't have a kid jack-it with a SIZE TWO COAT!
Well tough-shit, fuck-kid my RHYMES TOO DOPE/ I wouldn't have a kid jacket with a SIZE TWO COAT!
|
06-19-2014, 02:50 PM
|
#72
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Well tough-shit, fuck-kid my RHMYES TOO DOPE/ I wouldn't have a kid jack-it with a SIZE TWO COAT!
Well tough-shit, fuck-kid my RHYMES TOO DOPE/ I wouldn't have a kid jacket with a SIZE TWO COAT!
|
|
|
06-19-2014, 02:50 PM
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,405
Mentioned: 509 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody
Y'all know about us? Doom straight down to "break entire crews" w/o a NEED TO FIX THE WHIP
^ Still doesn't make sense
How do you break & tire a crew without the need to fix the whip? Or how do you break entire crews without the need to fix a whip?
|
Okay, let's put a nail in this coffin.
By that logic, you're saying it should work both ways conceptually as well: Remember, the flip is implied when utilising a double entendre, not DIRECT.
Ya’ll aint real-fake’s inside-of-you. .& fuck ya ‘trans mission’ cuz “Wheel brake-n-tire-crews” like novice me-CHANICS IN TEAMS
This isn't me questioning you, this is your criticism broadcasted on your own bar.
How do you break entire crews like mechanics in teams? That's not directly clear. Oh yeah, that's because it's a concept flip.
Just like my example except it works both ways grammatically as a natural sentence.
Correct/ Incorrect
" Straight down to break entire crews/ Straight down to break n' tire crews"
" Because we'll break entire crews/ Because wheel brake n' tire crews"
Anyone with half a brain will understand this.
__________________
THE ViTRiOL WIFEY
|
06-19-2014, 02:50 PM
|
#73
|
Basic Audio Record 116 Points / 11 Won / 4 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 0 Points / Won / Lost
Basic Text Record 1692 Points / 141 Won / 35 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 0 Points / Won / Lost
Join Date: Sep 2010
Voted:
18
audio / 762
text
Posts: 2,405
Mentioned: 509 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody
Y'all know about us? Doom straight down to "break entire crews" w/o a NEED TO FIX THE WHIP
^ Still doesn't make sense
How do you break & tire a crew without the need to fix the whip? Or how do you break entire crews without the need to fix a whip?
|
Okay, let's put a nail in this coffin.
By that logic, you're saying it should work both ways conceptually as well: Remember, the flip is implied when utilising a double entendre, not DIRECT.
Ya’ll aint real-fake’s inside-of-you. .& fuck ya ‘trans mission’ cuz “Wheel brake-n-tire-crews” like novice me-CHANICS IN TEAMS
This isn't me questioning you, this is your criticism broadcasted on your own bar.
How do you break entire crews like mechanics in teams? That's not directly clear. Oh yeah, that's because it's a concept flip.
Just like my example except it works both ways grammatically as a natural sentence.
Correct/ Incorrect
" Straight down to break entire crews/ Straight down to break n' tire crews"
" Because we'll break entire crews/ Because wheel brake n' tire crews"
Anyone with half a brain will understand this.
__________________
THE ViTRiOL WIFEY
|
Offline
|
|
06-19-2014, 02:52 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,815
Mentioned: 837 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
Well tough-shit, fuck-kid my RHMYES TOO DOPE/ I wouldn't have a kid jack-it with a SIZE TWO COAT!
Well tough-shit, fuck-kid my RHYMES TOO DOPE/ I wouldn't have a kid jacket with a SIZE TWO COAT!
|
@ Dean fail
You just finished saying a wordplay has to make sense when read both ways
How can a kid jack it with a SIZE TWO COAT?
Jacket & Size 2 coat is the concept and it makes sense conceptually. not grammatically or in literary terms
but now everything goes back to my original point
Stop being anal faggots about every single word placement because we can scrutinize each other's shit all day and never agree on anything
|
06-19-2014, 02:52 PM
|
#74
|
Basic Audio Record 1005 Points / 55 Won / 5 Lost
Basic Text Record 302 Points / 22 Won / 5 Lost
Join Date: Aug 2010
Voted:
106
audio / 81
text
Posts: 6,815
Mentioned: 837 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
Well tough-shit, fuck-kid my RHMYES TOO DOPE/ I wouldn't have a kid jack-it with a SIZE TWO COAT!
Well tough-shit, fuck-kid my RHYMES TOO DOPE/ I wouldn't have a kid jacket with a SIZE TWO COAT!
|
@ Dean fail
You just finished saying a wordplay has to make sense when read both ways
How can a kid jack it with a SIZE TWO COAT?
Jacket & Size 2 coat is the concept and it makes sense conceptually. not grammatically or in literary terms
but now everything goes back to my original point
Stop being anal faggots about every single word placement because we can scrutinize each other's shit all day and never agree on anything
|
Offline
|
|
06-19-2014, 02:52 PM
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 693
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 7 Thread(s)
|
Nah, I just think the wordplay itself has to work both ways, not necessarily be a full gramatically perfect sentence. Because in that aspect, neither ways work because a gramatically formed sentence cant start with "because".
Way I seen the wordplay.... "Wheel Brake & Tire crews" stands on it's own legs. It's the oronym in itself that makes sence.
We will break entire crews, and wheel brake and tire crews. Now I know what you're referring to as well, when you use homonyms and homophones, I think that's the more traditional way to do it when you try to formulate the sentence concept to work. some wack shit but like "blue ya shot" like a smurf in a shooting range. <-- That would work both ways because of the homophone used. but when you use an oronym, it's tricky because they don't work the same way homophones work, seeing as phonetically it changes the entire sentence itself.
"The Stuff He Knows can be dangerous."
"The Stuffy Nose can be dangerous."
^ See what I mean? So obviously when using an oronym like that, it would change the sentence formation and concept itself to be something entirely different.... but that's what oronyms do.
Just saying.... You don't have to think it's "Hot", Or "Dope", but... Gramatically.... PulSe is right.... ON THAT SINGLE CONCEPT anyways... And I don't think i've ever said those words before.
Excuse me while I bleach my mouth out and kill myself now. lol.
|
06-19-2014, 02:52 PM
|
#75
|
Banned
Basic Text Record 18 Points / 1 Won / 0 Lost
Join Date: Jun 2014
Voted:
2
audio / 40
text
Posts: 693
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 7 Thread(s)
|
Nah, I just think the wordplay itself has to work both ways, not necessarily be a full gramatically perfect sentence. Because in that aspect, neither ways work because a gramatically formed sentence cant start with "because".
Way I seen the wordplay.... "Wheel Brake & Tire crews" stands on it's own legs. It's the oronym in itself that makes sence.
We will break entire crews, and wheel brake and tire crews. Now I know what you're referring to as well, when you use homonyms and homophones, I think that's the more traditional way to do it when you try to formulate the sentence concept to work. some wack shit but like "blue ya shot" like a smurf in a shooting range. <-- That would work both ways because of the homophone used. but when you use an oronym, it's tricky because they don't work the same way homophones work, seeing as phonetically it changes the entire sentence itself.
"The Stuff He Knows can be dangerous."
"The Stuffy Nose can be dangerous."
^ See what I mean? So obviously when using an oronym like that, it would change the sentence formation and concept itself to be something entirely different.... but that's what oronyms do.
Just saying.... You don't have to think it's "Hot", Or "Dope", but... Gramatically.... PulSe is right.... ON THAT SINGLE CONCEPT anyways... And I don't think i've ever said those words before.
Excuse me while I bleach my mouth out and kill myself now. lol.
|
Offline
|
|
06-19-2014, 02:53 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Niggas cry like kids.
This deserves a temporary ban. Maybe 2-3 day ban.
Who creates a thread in the Public lounge.. not text.
get this fagget the fuck outta here
|
06-19-2014, 02:53 PM
|
#76
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Niggas cry like kids.
This deserves a temporary ban. Maybe 2-3 day ban.
Who creates a thread in the Public lounge.. not text.
get this fagget the fuck outta here
|
|
|
06-19-2014, 02:53 PM
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,405
Mentioned: 509 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
This hasn't been an argument, Pulse. This has been an epic battle to try make you see sense. I have failed, your stupidity and ignorance is too strong. Dean is attempting like the brave knight he is but we are falling weak and shattered at the flames of this MIGHTY RETARD DEMON. THE DRAGON OF DENIAL HAS SLAIN US. SLAIN US I TELL YE.
Thank you, Dean. Someone actually knows what wordplay is.
On another side-note, Pulse has avoided my request to send bars twice now. I rest my case.
__________________
THE ViTRiOL WIFEY
|
06-19-2014, 02:55 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,815
Mentioned: 837 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
lol @ ViTRiOL saying he understands what wordplay is then agreeing that Dean had a solid wordplay
So both of you explain to me how Dean's wordplay makes sense when read both ways
I'm trying to learn how to jack it with a size 2 coat, yo
|
06-19-2014, 02:58 PM
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,405
Mentioned: 509 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizzo
Nah, I just think the wordplay itself has to work both ways, not necessarily be a full gramatically perfect sentence. Because in that aspect, neither ways work because a gramatically formed sentence cant start with "because".
Way I seen the wordplay.... "Wheel Brake & Tire crews" stands on it's own legs. It's the oronym in itself that makes sence.
We will break entire crews, and wheel brake and tire crews. Now I know what you're referring to as well, when you use homonyms and homophones, I think that's the more traditional way to do it when you try to formulate the sentence concept to work. some wack shit but like "blue ya shot" like a smurf in a shooting range. <-- That would work both ways because of the homophone used. but when you use an oronym, it's tricky because they don't work the same way homophones work, seeing as phonetically it changes the entire sentence itself.
"The Stuff He Knows can be dangerous."
"The Stuffy Nose can be dangerous."
^ See what I mean? So obviously when using an oronym like that, it would change the sentence formation and concept itself to be something entirely different.... but that's what oronyms do.
Just saying.... You don't have to think it's "Hot", Or "Dope", but... Gramatically.... PulSe is right.... ON THAT SINGLE CONCEPT anyways... And I don't think i've ever said those words before.
Excuse me while I bleach my mouth out and kill myself now. lol.
|
That's lazy and imperfect in my opinion. I think the general consensus of accurate wordplay nowadays is that it has to work both ways as a wordplay without being forced and work in natural speech and as a grammatically correct sentence.
Oldheads are still coming around to this but I personally think it's what real skillful wordplay should be. Thanks for the input dude.
---------- Post added at 06:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:56 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody
lol @ ViTRiOL saying he understands what wordplay is then agreeing that Dean had a solid wordplay
So both of you explain to me how Dean's wordplay makes sense when read both ways
I'm trying to learn how to jack it with a size 2 coat, yo
|
Did I agree with the example? No. Read up proper. It makes much more sense that what you attempted however.
I am crediting Dean on his knowledge on the matter, everyone else has missed the point. Including you.
__________________
THE ViTRiOL WIFEY
|
06-19-2014, 02:58 PM
|
#79
|
Basic Audio Record 116 Points / 11 Won / 4 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 0 Points / Won / Lost
Basic Text Record 1692 Points / 141 Won / 35 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 0 Points / Won / Lost
Join Date: Sep 2010
Voted:
18
audio / 762
text
Posts: 2,405
Mentioned: 509 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizzo
Nah, I just think the wordplay itself has to work both ways, not necessarily be a full gramatically perfect sentence. Because in that aspect, neither ways work because a gramatically formed sentence cant start with "because".
Way I seen the wordplay.... "Wheel Brake & Tire crews" stands on it's own legs. It's the oronym in itself that makes sence.
We will break entire crews, and wheel brake and tire crews. Now I know what you're referring to as well, when you use homonyms and homophones, I think that's the more traditional way to do it when you try to formulate the sentence concept to work. some wack shit but like "blue ya shot" like a smurf in a shooting range. <-- That would work both ways because of the homophone used. but when you use an oronym, it's tricky because they don't work the same way homophones work, seeing as phonetically it changes the entire sentence itself.
"The Stuff He Knows can be dangerous."
"The Stuffy Nose can be dangerous."
^ See what I mean? So obviously when using an oronym like that, it would change the sentence formation and concept itself to be something entirely different.... but that's what oronyms do.
Just saying.... You don't have to think it's "Hot", Or "Dope", but... Gramatically.... PulSe is right.... ON THAT SINGLE CONCEPT anyways... And I don't think i've ever said those words before.
Excuse me while I bleach my mouth out and kill myself now. lol.
|
That's lazy and imperfect in my opinion. I think the general consensus of accurate wordplay nowadays is that it has to work both ways as a wordplay without being forced and work in natural speech and as a grammatically correct sentence.
Oldheads are still coming around to this but I personally think it's what real skillful wordplay should be. Thanks for the input dude.
---------- Post added at 06:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:56 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody
lol @ ViTRiOL saying he understands what wordplay is then agreeing that Dean had a solid wordplay
So both of you explain to me how Dean's wordplay makes sense when read both ways
I'm trying to learn how to jack it with a size 2 coat, yo
|
Did I agree with the example? No. Read up proper. It makes much more sense that what you attempted however.
I am crediting Dean on his knowledge on the matter, everyone else has missed the point. Including you.
|
Offline
|
|
06-19-2014, 02:59 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,815
Mentioned: 837 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
ViTRiOL what the fuck do you know about a wordplay working in natural speech
If I used that bar in audio it would absolutely fuckin smash and it'd be the one everyone highlights as one of the more solid bars of the verse
it'd smash in URL, KOTD, and GT too. & don't even say it doesnt work in audio because if you thought you were iight in text listen to an audio battle from me LOL
but since its text you got ya lotion out, 5 inch thick spectacles on, and your 8th grade English book
8 pages of your bullshit rhetorical puzzling text questions all for the sake of defending your vote that no other veteran on the website agrees on
again
why the fuck is this nigga FVC
lol
Last edited by Godbody; 06-19-2014 at 03:01 PM.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
,
|
|
|
,
|
|
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 AM.
|
|
|