UnEthical and Wigsplit asking for votes.

[IV]

Yeah everybody knows BLNKs a faggot anyway

[Obey]

cheating present participle of cheat (Verb)
Verb
Act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage, esp. in a game or examination: "she cheats at cards".
Deceive or trick.

Did anyone act dishonestly? No.. Did anyone gain an advantage? No.. Did anyone deceive or trick anyone? No.. Where is the cheating at?

@BLNK @Dave @Wigsplit

[Wigsplit]

It's all about law and order. He could've just looked the other way considering he understood the situation, but being the law abiding citizen that he is, he took a stand. He never breaks rules in real life either, he is an amazing person and I learned a valuable lesson. Thank you.

[Aggo]

^Fair point. It's whatever, the two people involved are on the same side of the argument. This is what this whole thread sounds like.

BLNK: Hey! Hey! Wig is stealing shit from Dave! Hey!

Dave: No, it's cool man. I told him he could have those.

BLNK: Hey! Hey everybody! Look what Wig is doing! Look! Hey!

Wig: Dude, he just said he didn't listen to these old 45's any more. He let me have them. I collect vinal.

BLNK: HEY MODS! Look whats going on over here! It's Maaaaaaaaaad shady! Hey! Hey look!

[Obey]

This is like calling the police for someome J-Walking, smh.

[J u s T C]

For the record I'm not saying any of them cheated. But the rule is there for a very good reason. You start making exceptions to this 1 and before you know it a bunch more people are doing it. Some new guys see them get away with it and they'll try their luck knowing they can just say "We both agreed" or "I wasn't asking him to vote for me" "Why are you punishing me? you let him (Wig) get away with it" Like Grizz say's it opens the flood gates or at the least has the potential too. Thats why it's no iming battle links PERIOD.. This way everyone is clear.

[Aggo]

Originally Posted by Just C

For the record I'm not saying any of them cheated. But the rule is there for a very good reason. You start making exceptions to this 1 and before you know it a bunch more people are doing it. Some new guys see them get away with it and they'll try their luck knowing they can just say "We both agreed" or "I wasn't asking him to vote for me" "Why are you punishing me? you let him (Wig) get away with it" Like Grizz say's it opens the flood gates or at the least has the potential too. Thats why it's no iming battle links PERIOD.. This way everyone is clear.

I can completely agree with this. But if that's the case, no one would know about it and try to emulate it if whistle blowers weren't shoving it in everyone's faces.

[V3numb]

its a snowball effect..



who who said wiggy really got an warning/infraction anyways?.. maybe he did get away with it..


but naw he prolly did get one.. Lmao poor guy

Look at all the attention in getting.

[SoupErb]

I ain't saying Rules should be applied to some people and not to others, but there's 2 sides to LB -
On one side: The people who are in the 'LB Community' so to speak; They(We) take part in organized Tournaments.. create legit crews, whether to be the best crew on the site or just an elevation crew.. Chat/Discuss/Debate in forums etc. And although there can be beef/disagreements there has always been a certain respect for 'THAT' side of LetsBeef's members.

On the other side: The distant people. People that log on, drop like 400 whack opens, snipe 200 of their own kind, self-vote, cheat etc etc.

You know what I mean.

My point being that maybe, just maybe, the tight-knit, trusted side of LB should be able to bend certain rules abit.. For example; Everybody knows getting votes on this bitch is dier; So asking certain dudes for a FAIR, UNBIAS vote should be aloud.. If that makes sense?

It's just recognising (A) type of members from (B) type of members.