Question to Audio Guys

Originally Posted by EtH

Ok, so I reciently voted on an audio battle. I'm not swaying by saying who battled but they both know as it's the only one I've voted on latley, It's a text-to-audio vs an audio guy. It seems like all the text guys are voting for the text guy, and all the audio votes for the audio guy.

Now, I personally believe that being in text first, makes us understand it all more. We get the importance of punches and lyricism as the number one thing in the battle.

I just want to ask the audio (non text) guys, what they prioritise. To me it seems like flow and listenability. You guys can't be marking punches first as on a few occasions that Ive seen, a text guy with clearly better punches has last to someone with decent at best ones. What is your voting aims?

You could have the nicest lines but if they arent delievered properly they are pretty much worthless. I think the painful thing to see with a text to audio transformation is the failure to get that this is music and its about making an audio production not just saying some things to a beat. I also think it should be taken into consideration that just because someone didnt start by typing in a text box doesn't mean they don't have bars and structure.