Haxors??

[UhMAZING]

Yo, someone had to have been dDos'n the site last night... the site server was slower than the special Olympics.

A.) Why would anyone take the time to DDOS this site? B.) Do you legitimately think that a user has a botnet big enough to cause that sort of slow down? Lol. Beside that, if you call ddos'ing hacking, then you're probably a skiddie.

[UhMAZING]

1. It's an easy target as it has very little traffic to it as it is.
2. You don't need Botnet to execute a dDos attack, only command prompt. (google it)
3. I'm not a Script Kiddie, but thanks.

4. If indeed there were no attacks on it, Pugz should charge Row the $5 a piece to each person he gave exclusive to in exchange for voting on his gay battle...and take that combined money and buy better hosting. It legit took LB 9 minutes to load a page last night, shortly after that the connection timed out all together.... Hence the dDos suggestion.

5. Naming this thread "Haxors" was a joke. Don't take everything so literal, bro.

Originally Posted by UhhMAZING

1. It's an easy target as it has very little traffic to it as it is. Being an easy target, doesn't necessitate motive to attack it.
2. You don't need Botnet to execute a dDos attack, only command prompt. (google it) Yes, you can use that method, but, without a botnet, it's considerably less damaging, and practically pointless. Especially for a site like this one, despite its low traffic.
3. I'm not a Script Kiddie, but thanks. That's what a skiddie would say. Haha.

4. If indeed there were no attacks on it, Pugz should charge Row the $5 a piece to each person he gave exclusive to in exchange for voting on his gay battle...and take that combined money and buy better hosting. It legit took LB 9 minutes to load a page last night, shortly after that the connection timed out all together.... Hence the dDos suggestion. I agree that there should be some better hosting. Because, last night is not the first instance of this. It has been recurring for weeks.

5. Naming this thread "Haxors" was a joke. Don't take everything so literal, bro. You're the news!

[Godbody]

This site is easy to DDoS and it'd be effortless for anyone with the know how. There wouldnt need to be a grudge or some giant motivation to do it. Believe it or not people do shit like that for the fuck of it.

Originally Posted by Godbody

This site is easy to DDoS and it'd be effortless for anyone with the know how. There wouldnt need to be a grudge or some giant motivation to do it. Believe it or not people do shit like that for the fuck of it.

Again, it'd be considerably more difficult without a botnet. And, they may DOS sites for the heck of it, sure. But, they often do so with the intent of recognition. You won't get recognition for DDOS'ing LB. This means, then, that the second most likely reason a person would DDOS this site, is for a personal reason. Which again, forces the question: A.) Who on this site has both such a strongly held grudge against the site, and would actually waste the time(and possibly risk federal prison) to do so? B.) Who on this site has shown the capacity for that type of understanding of computer science to follow through with such an event? C.) Why would they do so with continuing frequency?

[Lizman]

All These New Sayings Kids Use Today

However You Are Both Wrong (Somewhat)
An Easy Target Does Necessitate Motive To Attack It On Comparably Large Sites Without Comparably Little Traffic.

[UhMAZING]

Originally Posted by Rant

Again, it'd be considerably more difficult without a botnet. And, they may DOS sites for the heck of it, sure. But, they often do so with the intent of recognition. You won't get recognition for DDOS'ing LB. This means, then, that the second most likely reason a person would DDOS this site, is for a personal reason. Which again, forces the question: A.) Who on this site has both such a strongly held grudge against the site, and would actually waste the time(and possibly risk federal prison) to do so? B.) Who on this site has shown the capacity for that type of understanding of computer science to follow through with such an event? C.) Why would they do so with continuing frequency?

I could dDOS Lb without Botnet and take down it's server in under 5 minutes. People don't have to have reasons to do the shit they do. Years ago when I first learned how to dDOS I took down an old Yahoo site that was dedicated to programs such as "Booters", "Crackers", "Key Loggers", etc. I didn't have any ill feelings towards the site, just did it as a test. Also, someone who is a real script kiddie wouldn't know what "skiddie" meant to begin with. I used to code programs just like the above mentioned with VB6.

Uhuh.

[Mindless]

>distributed denial of service is easier on low traffic sites

Uhm, no. Because if there's a shitload of traffic there's fewer resources available that your attack needs to tie up to take the site down.


There's been tons of errors lately and as per usual nobody with the power to do anything about it is. I don't remember if it was Noble or Pugz but one of them didn't even log in for over a month and the other one was like three weeks or so. They really need to just sell this place to someone who's going to do something with it already.