KILLERS.

I was gonna leave the site, at least for a while, but Lock reminded me that I still have to do this battle. Should be a nice parting gift.

my winner was better in jus about every sense. my loser had a ok round, thought they'd drop sumn way harder than this. both had sum issues.. ones readibilty was terrible and tha other lacked freshness. but for tha most part, good battle. Fairs in. #KINGVOTE

Dope battle here. I feel like one had much more punch attempts but it was hit and miss. Not very consistent. I think it would've been better if the punch count was lower and it was more polished with slightly longer set ups for inflict more punishment. Don't get me wrong tho, there were still haymakers thrown but the verse was sort of a roller coaster and lacked consistency. I feel the other did what his opponent didn't. Had the punch attempts that were complimented by the set ups so as a reader I felt the impact more. Some pretty unique concepts also. Overall this was a good battle. I have the winner taking this by a more consistent verse and a more polished verse. Good luck to both. 

first of all kudos to both for posting a 32 and esp a pretty entertaining for most of it this was a good battle overall which got a little too close sometimes but then a little more clearer coz of the misses from one while the other had almost none. OG iwasn't diggin much of your opening lines but u pretty much lifted ur level with the temple line and fortunately went on to maintain the level after that with the body sho, bike tyres, displays and the sho on the road was my favourite while Sho really left little to to be desired and was on point, lucid and near flawless with his wording, wordplays and set ups almost throughout which gave his phoenix, african child labour (shit was mean), shaman, vlad the impaler constructing apartments, the shoveling garbage was funny too the closer was ok tho all in all sho had the more consistent performance punch wise which is why i am leaning with him in this battle not by much though but clearly enough.