Bnas got this with the better punches in his verse. Rhyming was iffy in spots (broken or forced multis), but overall he had the cleaner read. Tab you were all over the place with really simplistic rhyming and didn't throw many punches to give yourself a chance here.

Tab was trying i think to get punches going but his use of multis didnt make sense to me most of  was just in ones so he need to read on cats here how to prpperly do . bnas has the concepts n decwnt punches dpwn and atleast knows how to set up punchlines so imma give him that. fv no h8

other than Bnas' closer the rest of his multis were on point syllable wise which was not that same with tab at all other than that from a diss point of view this was a much closer affair but Bnas had lower lows compared to his tab here which edges him the win for me here both had a few sparks which could have been if built up on though.

Bnas was just overall better rhyme for rhyme. Tab could use a little work and should start getting into writing multis. Classic bnas here. Fairs in

Tab3rkalosis's verse was very satisfactory. The way they were set up were rather odd and didn't allow his bars to carry much impact in themselves. Multi-syllable incorporation was rather below decent. The content within this opponent's verse was also rather strange and carried weird value to it that I felt like made Tab3rkalosis look bad even. 

Even though Bnas's opener had a broken multi "LEADER, PATHETIC" (5 syllables) "BEATER, HEAD SICK" (4 syllables) it still hit harder than what his opponent brought to the table. The responder also set up his bars in ways that made actual sense and wasn't a bunch of weirdo flexing like his opponent's was. Ultimately his lines connected better in ways that hit his opponent hard enough to score him the W here from me.