Expo: chris unbias is the battle blogger that's currently in jail for rape. The "one sided" line was a reference to this battle being  one sided and also the the "has no coin, gets no tail,  only head" line. It's like saying that a coin with only head and no tails is also one sided. For the record,  they're called "metaphors". And,  as far as they go,  that "one sided" one is disgusting in complexity and disguisingness. 

Shout out to people who actually read the battles before they vote,  btw 

OPS!!!

This was a cool spar, both were around the same level of complexity in terms of verse structure & multi usage- in terms of who took this battle for me personally it was the one whos concepts/wordplay worked the tiniest bit better. TTG had some more forced kinda Wp at times as well as weirdly connected set ups leading to his punch. Like the chris unbiased theme, I like the non-direct approach bcus thats how you create unique haymakers but i feel like the way you loosely connected the punch made it fall flat. I feel like painn was more relatably structured and came a tad more conceptually direct whilst still maintaining grasps for conceptual manipulation. gg men, no hate intended.

Tee:

It's important for your wordplay to work both ways. Your first bar read like this makes little sense. "He's a hobo (weird lisp sound) of us know hes been begging to get hurt". If your sentance doesnt read right both ways than your wordplay is hindering more than helping.

You go on to make a heads or tails reference but it didn't really connect or make clear enough reference to a one sided coin to make the punch work. Also, using the round wp to mean anything in the world that is circular is super played and not very clever.

The sit down/slept on sit down/tired shit read recently but again, the creativity isn't really there.

The crystal wp again doesnt read right both ways. And you finish with more of a diss than a punch. Since you lack any metaphor or double entendre or pun or other potentially punchy literary element it is mostly just a couple lines of filler.

Work on: making sure your wordplay can be read naturally 2 ways. Also try to be more complex in your ideas and less so in your wording. The idea should be creative, the wording should convey that creative message in the simplest way possible.

Painn:

Gotta say I read this multiple times and I just do not get that 1st bar. I can't tell if its worded really weird or its just a reference I'm not getting, but... wooshy.

I also am not a huge fan of the ABAB rhyme scheme in this first bar, the rhymes aren't perfect and the switch makes me lose the multi. That said the pastors timer price punch was alright.

The casual tee wp is played but it is the best example of a wp reading naturally both ways in this battle. 

The catch a body pun is pretty played as well.

The disfigured wordplay isn't really working cuz nowhere are you implying that you word be disfiguring anyone.

The called at Argus shit was clever but the execution was severely lacking.

Work on: wording things to read smoothly to convey your message clearly to the reader. Add some more relevent references in your setups to make your punches land.

The winner of this battle conveyed his message cleaner which made his punches more impactful. Also had a better usage of wordplay and the basics of a battle. Loser was more complex but it needs to be tightened up. 

OPS!

winners concepts and punches hit harder.