hmmm...seen a lot better from both before. One had a higher punch count but also had more misses as a result. A couple good ideas, a few that weren't as original. Some of the multis weren't as smooth as Id expect from dude....rust perhaps but easily the cleaner read here. The other had much fresher concepts and more elaborate setups but was really, really wordy in between punches at times. Some ideas were good, others a little obscure...clever don't always hit hard. This was tough but I'm leaning this way...barely. Coinflip, highs Posted on: 2015-11-29 18:20:17

Wordplay Expos: Herpes, Urine/ Four stomach in the beef, 40 meter (length of a cows intestine)/ Over react/ The rest should be straight forward. #TheDons!! Comment Only
Posted on: 2015-11-29 16:06:14

Some of ones set ups didn't fully connect with the punch. Flow was choppy in places, didn't like the closer. Overall there some new concepts, not a bad read overall. Others verse kinda opposite here, had nice set ups but the punches could of been worded better. Counted at least one broken multi, Closer was decent. Overall this is pretty close, but I got one edging in more categories than not. Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-29 16:48:12

A little generous on the rates guys...I felt the wording could of been been better in both I would say the only difference to me was one was more relevant to the punch in my opinion..The fairs in Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-29 17:42:24

Shotty reach'll branch out and have this Fruit round up" like ELEPHANT APPENDAGES!! Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-29 17:54:44

the audience "Mourning After"a listen like the PREVENTION OF A BIRTH shit your "Delivery alone is Null & Void" oce we 'SEE SECTIONS' OF YA VERSE!!// Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-29 17:56:01

Alot of nice ideas threw in these two boxes. Both came with one OK set ups . One was so nice wit the vocab puns I had to google a word lol.. Fv in one stuck out more . The other didn't really lose . One did change the game wit a bar idea I never seen before Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-29 18:08:26

Mind Fuck: You had one broken multi, which hurts. Overall, your concepts were decent, but didn't grammatically or logically connect to the punchlines. They were understandable, but structurally flawed. This verse was decent, but for the love of Pugz, make your concepts grammatically correct. 2FUEL: This wasn't bad. Some (not most) of your bars shared Mind Fuck's structural disconnectedness. The concepts were decent, if not especially creative. Your rhyming was imperfect, but better than usual. Overall, I feel that one took this with execution. A few edits to my loser's verse would have changed that. Fair's in. Mid-Low. Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-29 18:56:29

tbh i wasnt very impressed with ones verse, showing a broken multie along with filler i felt was not needed, concepts a bit stretched whilst my winner had a more advanced verse, showing more compressed concepts to lead to his punches with a more solid structure, fairs in. Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-29 22:51:55

You guys pretty much covered it all so im just gonna throw my winner out there. He had the most consistency. Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-29 23:20:24

One's verse was more well connected and had harder punches IMO both were punching hard and as has been said both had some broken rhymes but very close battle Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-30 16:30:49

good battle . both had some good concepts that really added to the punches , tho as been said already some of the multis were not so great . pretty even elsewhere so can see this being another close call but going with the one who had the slightly funnier drop . fv n nh Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-11-30 19:36:39

Good battle. Both brought bars with their two different styles. One verse seemed like a bunch of one liners that were almost tied together, but loosely and a bit scatterbrained going from concept to concept. I agree as other voters mentioned that both had very minor set up relevancy issues where the connection to the punch is slightly stretched. The scheming by both was alright although I have seen stronger from both. The other verse had longer built up punches, but some seemed long winded and weaker with only one haymaker really landing in my opinion. This was a close and fun battle, and could go either way. I read them several times over, and am leaning towards the verse with the higher punch count in this instance as I think a couple of those quick punches landed more vs. one haymaker. RESPECT 2 both. FV in. Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-12-01 15:12:47

Both dudes came with a wide range of concepts, though one executed his approach better both dudes were dope. My loser came out swinging and if he could of kept the same haymakers he had at the beginning of the battle I think he would have took this. Both dudes 9/10 with the multis. Fairs in Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-12-01 15:26:44

neither verse really is at the level you both are capable of. nonetheless there are some quotables. fair vote is in. Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-12-02 15:34:44

Close battle. Both had solid concepts thru the verse.. Winners had smoother read & flow. Fv Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-12-02 15:59:06

I felt here that ones verse was overall executed better in terms of wording. The flow was easier to follow too. The other had some really nice ideas but didn't execute them well enough and some of the rhymes took a while to get to which made the flow choppy. Overall, my winner was smoother. Fairs dropped Voted: Mind Fuck / 2FUEL
Posted on: 2015-12-02 16:17:26