FV.no hate.. winner had a better read, concepts and punches. loser had a few jabs but it wasnt enough..gb Voted: AfterLife / Tab3rkalosis
Posted on: 2015-11-05 08:03:18

ok one had some nice ideas which were not fully exploited due to the wording . jabs were kinda light ,multis were for the most part ok tho some were really forced . other started of ok ,but standard dropped off with a lot of filler . didnt really thro any punches of notes , needs to concentrate on attacking his opponent . both needwork but both have potential.fv n nh Voted: AfterLife / Tab3rkalosis
Posted on: 2015-11-05 14:22:07

One had it in terms of the concepts but the wording was an issue and the punches weren't hitting like they should of been. The other i though was lacking with concepts and they also had an issue wording but his structure is pretty decent. Voted: AfterLife / Tab3rkalosis
Posted on: 2015-11-05 19:46:51

The more original flair and fanfare presented by my winner won him this, alongside harder-hitting bars that struck where they need to. I feel like he stretched a bit, but that strain in his bars was enough to pull him ahead. My loser was a little "wonky" with his multis which I felt took away from his punches, but that's just my take on it. Fair's in. Voted: AfterLife / Tab3rkalosis
Posted on: 2015-11-06 01:22:50

My winner mixed decent punches with filler. Their content between multi sets was excessively wordy, but the verse was structurally passable. My loser had a barely-decent, choppy flow. He completed neglected every tenet of legitimate battling. Both need work in all areas. Fair's in. Voted: AfterLife / Tab3rkalosis
Posted on: 2015-11-07 14:49:51