One tried to stay relevant thru his setup but it didn't really build to anything other than a threat. The other was really wordy between multis but had a more creative concept and executed better than his opponent. Posted on: 2015-10-16 18:34:08

I honestly respect my loser's attempt at a KO but what affected it was the build-up leading to the punch, I feel he should've added something about Dominos in his bar instead of outside his bar... The other had the inner-rhyme scheme working for him, but what I think hurt his bar was that he mentioned something about the Oregon shooting, but didn't say anything about shooting him or anything about a gun, so this was incomplete to me. The winner's punch, to me, had more sting tho. Voted: Letum / Student
Posted on: 2015-10-16 05:04:51

Good scrap. Both had a straight bar/concept.. winner had a lil stronger punchline tho.. Fv Voted: Letum / Student
Posted on: 2015-10-16 05:48:12

Ones attempt at staying on concept slipped away . Fv in Voted: Letum / Student
Posted on: 2015-10-17 08:55:42

So far, the best bar v bar i've read. Both had some creative concepts. Feel one's was overall executed better. Fairs in, i'm out. Voted: Letum / Student
Posted on: 2015-10-17 16:01:00

GB. fire bars from both. my winner delivered the scheme a little more cohesively imo. fv Voted: Letum / Student
Posted on: 2015-10-18 10:51:55

One was clearly had more of a direct style towards their opponent while the other was alright in terms of their concept Voted: Letum / Student
Posted on: 2015-10-18 19:49:53

One's strong internal rhyming made a good bar out of a bad concept. The other had a good concept, but the execution was poor. The severest flaw was the distance between the multi sets. So one won through execution. Fair's in. Voted: Letum / Student
Posted on: 2015-10-20 22:17:19