One's flow was nice + maintained it throughout but was nowhere near as creative as his opponent, who hit consistently harder from start to finish. Highs for both. Good shit fellas. Posted on: 2015-09-11 17:28:18

Sheesh, WRECKING CREW! Comment Only
Posted on: 2015-09-11 23:15:35

I have no idea why this battle is being slept on the way it is, but both men had great drops here. I felt OG had an intense beginning, but the creativity and impact began wavering towards the end. I understand scheming for Row is difficult because almost every punchline/concept has been utilized. So trying to be over-complex to compensate for that wouldn't have been smart. The one real way to hit on him with personals would be to take those concepts and flip them in new ways, which is what you tried to do. On the surface people will say "I've seen that before" but I see a little deeper. So, props to you on that. Just wanted to make that publicly known. Row, I must say I was caught by surprise. I never thought you were ass or anything but you really came back swinging. Great punchlines and great schemes made your verse very enjoyable to read, IE: the lesson in brail line, falsetto, and even the dragonball reference. All great ideas that looked great in the box and read well as far and flow and all that good stuff. My vote is concealed, but always explained. Good shit gents. Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-12 01:28:19

Both y'all had a nice verse.. close bout to me. Punches & entertainment factor were on point.. Winner had a couple stronger swings for the W.. but neither disappointed. This should def be hot lister.. Fv Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-12 17:04:00

I thought this was a pretty clear win to be honest. My loser schemed cleanly enough, but I found some of his set-ups/wordplay to be a little cheesy. That meant that I didn't enjoy his punches *all* that much. My winner came with some *dope* material. His punches and concepts seemed novel (to me at least), and his scheming was excellent throughout. Both were good reads, but one just came that much harder for me! Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-12 20:02:07

I liked ones punches. But their was just too much filler. So it came down to ones wordplay and multis and I really liked their ender as well. Decent Battle Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-12 20:21:24

both had points of interest..both had different structure..light and harder punches in there..flow was decent in both but ifeltone had more aggression than the other..votes in Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-12 21:12:37

Thought both were close in most categories just one had slightly better concepts / punches. Both nice. FV yall Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-13 00:04:51

hi to low9's in this erre bodi kno my rates is above what they are but when u got sum good written then ya kno but close close here !!! freaking re read this like 786688656 times just kidding i was reallly hoping the loser would merk this fool the loser started off hellla nice slightly let off the gas just a little for the winner to pass , really dont like the winner cuz well ill keep this concealed, but thr winner had keen concepts setups , wordplay , punches , so did the loser !! but yea good battle all fairs in !!!! Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-13 14:58:27

fv Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-13 15:36:37

for me one had some nice stuff but was mixed in with a lot of filler . other was more complex and consistent and threw the heavier punches . Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-13 17:59:25

Dam this was a good read both came with heat might be back for final decision ~ Comment Only
Posted on: 2015-09-13 21:13:34

one had a very clean verse.. with played /weak punches... one wasnt as clean, a couple played concepts, but consistently hit wit a bit more creativity.. not the best i seen from both, but one managed to overpower his opponent in a few elements Voted: O_G /
Posted on: 2015-09-14 00:38:47