expo ; undertaking/hears es holy shit/fart in church subserved = . i. - To be subservient or subordinate; to serve in an inferior capacity. Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-07-30 14:46:30

want someone good to take this , want a good battle , not against some non box filler etc lol Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-07-30 14:48:00

expo should be undertaking/hearses as in undertakers - fart in church /holy shit is separate pun . :P) Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-07-30 14:50:43

good battle jay ;0 Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-07-30 15:08:36

Both were very basic here. One started off with a couple played concepts, but executed them fairly well then took a nose-dive in terms of quality while the other, despite also finishing poorly; had simple, but clean and in this case effective punches. FVC votes in. Voted: COFFIN DODGER / JayPrince
Posted on: 2014-07-30 15:32:47

and I thought these were some of my best bars !! had a multi going throughout and thought I had some goos punches and was funny . and as for a 4 ? ffs , that means its not even rated as 'not bad' , when I see shit written by faggots that scores way higher . multis , wordplay , punches and humor obviously count for fckin nothing . bollox to this , off to get stoned !!!!!!!!!!!!1 Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-07-30 15:42:22

Thats just his honest opinion venom Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-07-30 15:45:13

I had a multi going throughout - Parkinson nurse , parkin some hearses , fart in some churches , and marking subserved , and I set all of them up !! I had wordplay on both meanings of undertaking . I had multis withiun multis . I had punches . I had humor . but obviously I don't know shit . 4 is a fucking joke and I don't give a fuck what anyone says . Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-07-30 16:10:53

I'm going to be looking at everything here to make sure that this gets the vote it honestly deserves. My winner, this is not the best I've seen from you, but close. I'm giving it to you because of your string of multis, interconnected concepts and comedic puns. All of this serves to flourish the strong punches behind your verse, which gives you the W. My loser, however--While your multis... Well, they aren't multis, you kept a consistent tempo the whole way through. This is the best I've seen from you and it's nice seeing you advance. While you lack in creativity, you make up for in clarity, giving your punches a near-solid connection, but they were a couple steps behind the winner's. That said, the actual fair vote's in. Voted: COFFIN DODGER / JayPrince
Posted on: 2014-07-30 17:21:29

lmao at last , ah honest vote ! amazing what happens when someone who knows what they talking about takes time to actually READ it ! Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-07-30 17:27:25

both where weak here. Ones bars where more coherent than the others. @stevevenom, just cos you've a few multis don't mean shit. Focus on your punches, then build from there. You can only get better, so keep trying. Read a few of the Real vets of the site to get a better understanding. (Mayneak, Jason, UNKNOWN ARTIST, REAL TALK, DaDDiO ) Voted: COFFIN DODGER / JayPrince
Posted on: 2014-07-30 18:30:10

This was very painful to read..my winner here had a few funny lines. And tried to do concepts..that were fundamentally basic.scheme work was somewhat consistent..loser here had a few hiccups in multi matching and disses lacked any real entertainment value.. fairs in Voted: COFFIN DODGER / JayPrince
Posted on: 2014-07-31 01:57:43

sorry for losing my rag , but as I said I thought I had some decent punches , especially the ones about parkinsons and about the only way to get the crowd on their feet was to fart in church - maybe its just my sense of humor.. Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-07-31 14:51:20

fv Voted: COFFIN DODGER / JayPrince
Posted on: 2014-08-01 17:28:22

my loser had a decent verse but my winner outpunched him good battle fv no hate Voted: COFFIN DODGER / JayPrince
Posted on: 2014-08-01 17:56:40