SCHEME: Manic Depression Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-05-11 22:30:06

AC SHIT!! Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-05-11 22:30:35

Lethal! Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-05-11 23:16:19

LeTHALIZING Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-05-12 02:22:29

ok Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-12 03:20:48

This honestly could have been real close. The ratings are based on scheme consistency and the conversion rate of punches. You both did very well with the scheme and both utilised different approaches. SoulL, I liked your conversational style with it - it flowed nicely and was an entertaining read. It's real impressive when you connect multis like that and have those long, relaxed build-ups to punches. The only downside to this, however, is that you can stretch it too long. While the multi chain is impressive, sometimes it can drag out for too long and the punch loses its weight: like the Hannah Montana concept. It was comical and had a lot of momentum but I feel like you used a little too much space for it. Overall, it was an impressive scheme verse [SLASHING HIS LEFT WRIST/CRAMMIN A NECKLACE] - the conversion to punches only lacked slightly due to your enthusiasm with the scheming. Wiz, I felt your approach was more punched based. At points, your style became conversational but I think you were focused mainly on finishing blows. Your doubled up multis had me rolling big time, I'm always a big fan of those. All in all, I feel like you even filled more space with schemework. Your verse was more of a calculated read for me, to understand concepts so it lacked that conversational style but there were some punches that were really impressive considering the scheme restriction. The opener was great with that tripled-up multi set. Act of Oppression bar was smooth and implied. Your punches were felt thoroughly. To summarise, after two reads, this was a very hard choice. I'll just say, without swaying, that the winner's closer was what tipped the balance in the end: And I think that's a valid explanation, haha. It was dope. Nice read fellas, Vitty's vote's in. Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-12 10:55:55

Wizdumb: Pretty solid verse. Little issue here and there with wording. Other than that, pretty solid. SoulL: Like your opponent, not a bad verse here. Seems you had more of a quick hit style going on, which can be good sometimes, but hardly any build up to the punches makes them lack the punching factor. Only actually 'big' build up was on the Hanna Montana...which i feel was all a stretch. Overall: One took this with better execution of the scheme, set ups and punches. Fairs in, Fuels out. (7-7) Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-12 16:19:05

One took it with cleaner concepts that were more original. Felt one tried a flip that backfired n hurt em alot. Seems experience an a better uncerstanding took it with cleaner delivery in addition. Fairs in Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-13 02:17:16

Logikk a 5.. Really Comment Only
Posted on: 2014-05-13 09:45:35

in a scheme battle its imperative to stay consistent and utilize every bit of black box. that being said in terms of tha overall battle this was rather ass. alotta multies being smashed together jus for rhyme sake, ma winner had better angles and used tha scheme better. more punches thrown and more landed. tha loser jus didn perform well here... long on tha draw and soft on tha approach. but for tha skill level, this battle was ok. Stay up fellas. Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-13 10:12:09

Very close but one got it Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-13 13:29:56

That Was Pretty Cool Dumb. Opener Didnt Flow Properly But Then It Went Smooth Albeit Under Par Punches. Kremlin Line Was Cool. Hanna Montana Line Was Good, Soul. Great Flow. Wouldve Been A Higher Rate But The Punches Were A Let Down. Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-13 15:24:26

ONE HAD WORDING ISSUES WICH AFECTED THE verse but one had gud concepts n one was mad consistent fairs in...vote back.. Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-14 07:38:19

#SAVEMONEY Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-14 16:33:39

So I'm pretty open that I prefer structures with a lot of repeated multies, and SoulL's verse was exactly my thing. I'm trying to contain the amount I like his verse. So I gotta say, Wizdumb came pretty correct. Scheme battles can be hard, and he did a good job keeping the multi going and keeping it readable. That said, the punches were pretty bland, and I didn't feel there was any real momentum or buildup in the verse. It seemed a lot to me like a lot of random multies about guns, followed by an average gunplay punch. SoulL didn't have any truly great punches, but he kept the scheme going very well, and pulled off some bars that are technically quite difficult. My heart says 9, but my brain says 8. Voted: Wizdumb / SoulL
Posted on: 2014-05-14 22:00:26