G'Luck Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-05-15 23:52:12

Now i read both verses twice. Very different styles here, one emcee w/ single hard hitting punches w/ slight filler against complex rhythmical lines... i was feeling both to be honest, but when it came down to making my final decision ones delivery took this..Prefrence is definatly a major factor for all future voters..close fellas and THANK YOU for the good read....GONZO vote//// Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-16 00:36:04

Late Expo: Talking about his rhyming in the first bar and last bar btw so it's not filler Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-05-16 12:13:03

Iight, both had ups n downs. One started off slow but finished strong. Could touch up on wording just a bit, that goes for both battlers tho. I think this verse had more thought/creativity within it. The other just couldn't seem to stay wit it, started off good tho. Had some played bars tho which really hurt the verse. Overall decent battle. keeping the rates 100 Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-16 17:34:16

ok first one def had more creative punches and original concepts..although from Now "My aim is to take you out’" like when a STEADY SHOOTER SIGHTS SQUARE then the way I’ll be ‘Getting in your head: To put an end to your dreams’ call me a FREDDY KRUGER NIGHT MARE!!//that line def could use some trimming-honestly reading it it felt like you had steady shooters sights square, and needed to finish with freddy kruger night mare, and the rest was just not needed...row had a more direct apporach, although the punches werent as original, it did read a lot smoother, it really comes down to prefence, my tie breaker is picking the one i think would sound better out loud..close one FV Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-17 00:01:10

Ight lets break it down ... Manhattan ... Bar1 ... Punch was cool but multis seemed abit forced for me skate sharpners who are they and does that job even EXSIST ??? 6/10 ... Bar2 ... Ok double punch bar first punch didnt work steady shooter sights square ... ??? Sights square ?? Seems forced to me ... Freddie Kruger concepts been played out so not hitting very hard for me ... 6/10 ... Bar3 ... To much filler between the multis lost the flow and the punch concept has been done ... 6/10 ... Manhattan fam this was not very good you had to many concepts for a 8 verse shoulda made it a 16 this way you could of got the flow down better less filler between multis and punches and this would have benefited the verse due to the filler you only really managed 3 legit bars ... R O W ... Bar1 ... Hmmm flow was in point concept was their but think it could of been executed better the flying payment section id have dropped or re-worded into the first part of the bar ... 6/10 ... Bar2 ... Hahaha liked this but againt think it could of been worded better but still nice flow was their 7/10 ... Bar3 ... Ok this was good final punch was on point but i felt some of the wordplays where not needed in this and abit over done but punch at the end and the concept was on point ... 6.5/10 ... Both good versus my winner was more consistent in terms of a complete verse flowing from start to end and had more personals in it the other person could have posted his as an open and this could of gone to anyone FV .:X:. Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-17 08:10:58

I guess you have never heard of a 'Hockey Rink' before? LOL skate sharpener is a real job my dude ain't no made up ish Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-05-17 08:16:10

Ooo ight i see what you saying now DR i was thinking skate boarding .... Still i factored in the fact i may not know what it was into the bar rating as i knew you would of had something to it if i hadnt i woulda gave the bar a lower rating than i did .... Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-17 08:23:13

I really couldn't put it anymore simply: One's punches just held more weight on top of more relevant setups. Alot of the losers concepts weren't developed to reach their maximized potential. Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-17 10:04:57

fv Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-05-17 10:39:43

Votes there, this was a dope battle but one edged it for me. Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-17 18:55:45

AC's DAMMIT! Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-05-17 19:21:45

per request .non expoed fv.. deleted Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-05-17 22:02:48

Son I'm in the Fair Voters Club you fucking idiot now quit swaying all over the battle faggot Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-05-17 22:48:12

Gl. Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-17 23:37:41

Short But Sweet Expo: DR. MAN - The opener was cool it was smooth, Multis were ok, i was feeling the wordplay, simple but effective, the punch was also a good jab, nice work. 2nd Bar has so much potential to be a heavy bar imo if it had a better setup for the 1st line, following line is a tad played out but overall a consistent bar. Closer was under developed imo i felt you could have bought something more heavier for the end but again a simple but effective bar. Overall: Good Multis, Punches were hot and cold throughout, Structure was solid, Concepts could have been more complex. Could have done with some more Wordplay. Not Bad, Not the best i've seen from you but a good clean n consistent drop. [Stand Out Lines: 2 & 3 ] R O W - Ok opener was cool, steady multis but the rhyming wasnt hitting also good use of name play but i wasn't feeling the punch. 2nd was structured very nicely, the multis were good and the execution was very good and to top it off you nailed the punch with good help from your setups, nice work. 3rd bar you cooled down though, you had some wordplay that wasn't hitting for me and had some that was unnecessary, the multis were cool but the rhyming is questionable in some but the closer was executed very nicely, the punch was good and the concept was cool. Overall: Multis were solid but had some arguable rhyming throughout, Punches were nice, Concepts were spotty some wordplay was nice but you had some unnecessary ones as well, Structure was good. Not bad either. [Stand Out Lines: Line 5 & Closing Line] Had to read twice but i caught something in ones drop that made me turn my vote from him so my winner just edged this with the more cleaner drop still though a close battle that can go both ways. Mid-High to Mid. Fairs In. APOC: Scream On'em. Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-17 23:42:10

also i see guys dropping expos now which is great, brilliant...but be careful i can see right through all of it easily predicting who you guys voted for. Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-17 23:47:30

All swaying comments HAVE BEEN DELETED quit the bullshit Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-05-18 12:29:25

Both were really great good wordplay and multies both has some punches but i felt like one caused more drama.. gb fv really hard battle to pick in the end Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-18 16:41:00

fv in Voted: Manhattan /
Posted on: 2013-05-18 23:42:11